Search for: "Commission on Presidential Debates"
Results 541 - 560
of 1,194
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2024, 3:00 am
The court case comes amid ongoing debate over the goals of the No Labels effort, which aims to potentially place a yet-to-be-identified bipartisan presidential ticket on as many ballots as possible. [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 1:19 pm
Applying this framework, the Article cuts against the ideological grain of current debates. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 2:00 am
Whether Van Buren, or John Quincy Adams, was the first president to have excessive facial hair is a debate for another day. [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 7:25 am
Indeed, Seila Law construes Humphrey’s Executor‘s holding so narrowly that — at least if Seila Law is read literally — it is debatable whether Humphrey’s Executor even protects today’s Federal Trade Commission, let alone other independent agencies. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
The "Global" Distinction: Legislators are not Officers Article II provides that in the event of a presidential and vice presidential double vacancy "Congress may by Law . . . declar[e] what Officer shall then act as President. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 7:00 am
The Commission's proposal still needs approval from national governments and the European Parliament, and extensive debate is likely to continue. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 9:33 am
And lawmakers have started to consider whether and how to discipline certain colleagues for feeding the lie that led to Jan. 6’s violence—the false notion that widespread fraud and irregularities in the 2020 presidential election allowed President Biden to cheat his way to victory. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 4:44 am
| European Commission on Biotech Directive: tomatoes about to be squashed? [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 5:00 am
If the President signs the CRA resolution into law, or Congress overrides a presidential veto, the regulation is deemed “disapproved” and will not take effect. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 3:08 pm
Cyberspace Solarium Commission Report. [read post]
13 Dec 2020, 8:23 am
Chesney and Steve Vladeck shared an episode of the National Security Law Podcast in which they debated the latest Supreme Court rulings, as well as whether the president can compel Pfizer to prioritize the U.S. for vaccine doses: Jeremy Gordon detailed the legal regime governing document preservation during a presidential transition. [read post]
24 Mar 2018, 4:43 am
Alina Polyakova argued that Russia’s presidential election elevated Putin from a president to a vozhd—a Stalinesque figure—with what seemed like the consent of the West. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 6:23 am
Most voters obviously shared my view that we faced a choice of two less-than-ideal presidential candidates, ultimately manifested in an extremely balanced split in popular vote but a decisive electoral vote victory for Mr. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 8:05 pm
As Roberts himself noted, contradicting his terrible dissent in the Arizona electoral commission case, a number of states do allow their citizenry to seize control of the redistricting project away from self-interested party hacks. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 11:24 am
Debate over Russian influence in the presidential election continued to heat up over the weekend after Friday’s announcement that President Obama had ordered a review of the Kremlin’s role in the campaign. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 7:46 pm
And since a president can always decline to issue a commission to a justice, it is not even clear that the president is under any mandatory legal duties here.) [read post]
29 Aug 2015, 6:50 am
On Monday, the Third Circuit issued its decision in the potentially landmark case Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 11:30 am
Vishnu Kannan compiled the national security highlights from the eleventh Democratic debate. [read post]
27 May 2024, 5:45 am
The jury must determine not only that Trump had an intent to defraud, but also that this intent included an intent to commit another crime, or to aid or conceal the commission of another crime. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 11:00 am
But it is politically unlikely that Congress would depart dramatically from its own federal bribery statute, and presently, the public lacks the information to seriously debate whether President Trump’s conduct has triggered it. [read post]
