Search for: "Companies A, B & C" Results 541 - 560 of 12,831
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2020, 7:52 am by Elliot Setzer
When large, powerful social media companies censor opinions with which they disagree, they exercise a dangerous power. [read post]
29 May 2020, 7:52 am by Elliot Setzer
When large, powerful social media companies censor opinions with which they disagree, they exercise a dangerous power. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 1:28 pm by Brett Frischmann
In this example, and others like nudging to promote voting or environmental protection, personalization primarily benefits third-parties—neither A nor B, but instead C. [read post]
3 May 2007, 5:59 am
  What if the Board says nothing, b/c they know a majority of their s/h will not vote for the acquisition? [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 9:01 am by Peter S. Lubin and Patrick Austermuehle
As the Court noted, Congress expressly stated that “the court” was tasked with deciding certain issues in Sections 502, 503, 504(c), and 505 but omitted the phrase from Section 504(b). [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 5:00 am by Doug Cornelius
To avoid that mess, most private funds look to two exemptions from the definition of “investment company”: 3(c)1 and 3(c)7. [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 3:21 pm by Georgialee Lang
An R&B all-star, who can forget Ray Charles’ rendition of “Georgia on my Mind”? [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 7:17 am
. $8.4 million B. $18.4 million C. $28.4 million D. $38.4 million Answer: D! [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 6:23 am by Steve Kalar
  Why fret now about good new sentencing guidelines coming next fall, when 18 USC § 3582(c)(2) will permit re-sentencing? [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 6:00 am by The Dear Rich Staff
In 2001 Company B, which is wholly owned by Company A entered into a joint venture funded by Company A with Company C. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 1:10 am by Kevin LaCroix
  In its August 19, 2011 press release (here), the plaintiffs’ firm that filed the lawsuit said that the complaint references assertions in the Alfred Little report that:   (a) SinoTech Energy’s  five largest subcontracting customers appear to be shell companies with unverifiable operations and minimal revenues; (b) SinoTech Energy’s sole chemical supplier appears to be an empty shell, with little or no revenues, a deserted office and no signs of… [read post]