Search for: "Connecticut v. Massachusetts" Results 541 - 560 of 723
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2011, 9:13 am by Tony Infanti
More of the same can be expected if the appeals courts uphold the recent federal district court decision in Gill v. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 3:59 am by Randy Barnett
If you remove just seven of the least populous blue states (Vermont, Delaware, Rhode Island, Hawaii, Massachusetts, New Mexico and Connecticut) and add Florida and Texas to reach two-thirds, you are well over one-half of the national population, and still with a mix of red and blue states from throughout the country.Realistically, repeal will only happen when the 535 persons comprising Congress plus the president are grossly out of step with public opinion, or when Congress has… [read post]
1 Jan 2011, 12:52 pm by Dan Farber
  The question there is whether Justice Kennedy finds this case distinguishable in terms of standing from Massachusetts v. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 11:13 am
The number of ill people identified in each state with the outbreak strain is as follows: California (1), Connecticut (1), District of Columbia (1), Georgia (1), Hawaii (1), Iowa (1), Illinois (51), Indiana (9), Massachusetts (1), Missouri (17), New York (1), Pennsylvania (2), South Dakota (1), Tennessee (1), Texas (1), Virginia (1), and Wisconsin (3). [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 10:22 pm by legalinformatics
Many papers on legal communication were presented at NCA 10: The 96th Annual Convention of the National Communication Association, held November 14-17, 2010 in San Francisco, California, USA. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 8:02 am by Sean Wajert
Justice Anthony Kennedy may turn out to be the pivotal vote in the case, based on his vote in Massachusetts v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 12:09 pm by Jonathan Zasloff
  They aren’t laughing now. 7)  I disagree with Ann re Sotomayor: she actually wasn’t on the panel that finally decided Connecticut v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 7:35 am by Jonathan H. Adler
 Second, I think standing here is distinguishable from Massachusetts v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 7:24 am by Coplan, Prof. Karl S.
At least four justices thus seem ready to revisit the broad standing recognized for States in Massachusetts v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 2:36 am by Kelly
Big River Resources Galva, LLC (Chicago IP Litigation Blog) Hasbro – District Court Massachusetts awards Hasbro injunction in water pistol patent case: Hasbro Inc v. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 9:58 pm by Lyonette Louis-Jacques
Massachusetts, 291 U.S. 97, 122, 54 S.Ct. 330, 338, 78 L.Ed. 674 (1934). [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 3:03 pm by Andrew Koppelman
Here’s the math:Jurisdictions that allow same-sex marriage include Connecticut, District of Columbia, Iowa, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, and Vermont. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 7:10 am by Gideon Alper
Legalization of gay marriage in Iowa, Massachusetts, Connecticut, D.C., and New Hampshire all resulted from court decisions. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 2:25 pm by Gideon Alper
Now 5 do: Connecticut, Iowa, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, and Vermont. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 2:58 pm
One of the attorneys for the Africans was Roger Sherman Baldwin, a grandson of Roger Sherman of Connecticut. [read post]