Search for: "Cooper v. General Standard, Inc."
Results 541 - 560
of 624
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Nov 2009, 12:29 pm
Three Rivers Electrical Cooperative, Inc., 26 S.W.3d 151, 160 (Mo. 2000); McWilliams v. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm
Environmental Protection Agency Region 5 has reached an agreement with Sunoco Inc. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 6:25 am
Medico (Filewrapper) BPAI finds claim indefinite and not directed to patentable subject under Bilski: Ex parte Hemmat (GRAY On Claims) District Court N D Illinois: KSR obviousness does not require prior art from the same field: Se-Kure Controls, Inc v Diam USA, Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Texas finds plaintiff has standing; agreement transfers ownership and simultaneously a conditional purchase by transferor from transferee: Balsam… [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 5:25 am
Medico (Filewrapper) BPAI finds claim indefinite and not directed to patentable subject under Bilski: Ex parte Hemmat (GRAY On Claims) District Court N D Illinois: KSR obviousness does not require prior art from the same field: Se-Kure Controls, Inc v Diam USA, Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Texas finds plaintiff has standing; agreement transfers ownership and simultaneously a conditional purchase by transferor from transferee: Balsam… [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 5:25 am
Medico (Filewrapper) BPAI finds claim indefinite and not directed to patentable subject under Bilski: Ex parte Hemmat (GRAY On Claims) District Court N D Illinois: KSR obviousness does not require prior art from the same field: Se-Kure Controls, Inc v Diam USA, Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Texas finds plaintiff has standing; agreement transfers ownership and simultaneously a conditional purchase by transferor from transferee: Balsam… [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 5:48 pm
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held in State of Connecticut v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 3:31 am
DRC, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2009, 9:30 pm
Gammie, 335 F.3d 889, 893 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc), because that power is generally reserved to our en banc panels. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 10:46 am
Second, in Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 7:01 am
(Spicy IP) NUJS IP talk: Raj Gandesha on section 3(d) and incremental innovation (Spicy IP) Discussion of Business Standard article on Prof Carlos Correa’s displeasure at being misquoted by the Technical Expert Group (Spicy IP) Kenya Should Kenya merge its industrial property and copyright offices? [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 3:00 am
Anjani Kumar Goenka & Anr (IP Frontline) Hollywood v Bollywood v Tollywood: When is ‘plagiarism’ equal to ‘copyright infringement’? [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 8:10 pm
Textron INc., 507 F. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 4:46 am
United States, 431 U.S. 324 (1977), and Cooper v. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 7:18 am
Why becoming generic might be good for a trade mark (IPKat) Good old days of counterfeiting in Hong Kong? [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 12:18 am
Assocs., Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2009, 7:31 am
At the same time, the SEC’s Inspector General has issued a number of reports critical of the agency, and Congress intensified pressure on the SEC and Department of Justice to bring cases in the wake of the financial crisis. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 6:45 am
(IP finance) Patent perishables – The effects on a company’s patent portfolio when it goes bust (IPEG) Canada Supreme Court rejects application to appeal procedural ruling in copyright case over photos showing marijuana plants growing in the plaintiff’s residence: Agnieska Wojtanowska, et al v Daniel Mustard, et al (Excess Copyright) Federal Court sets high standard of evidentiary detail, reaffirms local distinctiveness in trademark… [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 8:00 am
As for the Blasius doctrine, the decision in Portnoy v. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 12:00 am
"June 25, 2009 - 2 PM: Otto International, Inc. v. [read post]
