Search for: "Cox v. Amend" Results 541 - 560 of 567
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Aug 2007, 8:04 am
Last October, the NYSE proposed amending Rule 452 to bar brokers from voting their clients' uninstructed shares in board elections after Jan. 1, 2008. [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 5:15 am
According to the Motion:"Chairman Cox noted that the Stoneridge case was on all fours with the 2004 Homestore case, in which the Commission voted unanimously to file an amicus brief. [read post]
27 Jul 2007, 5:20 am
  Chairman Cox was the deciding vote on both, something that has been described as Solomon like. [read post]
11 Jul 2007, 3:11 am
Ed. 1031 (1942); see also Cox v. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 3:37 pm
The motion is very heavy on the 1st amendment and very light on 230. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 8:03 am
Hawaii Department of Human Services (06-1267, cert. papers), involving a claim by blind vendors of a right to sue state and local government for denying them a preference in operating stands or vending machines in non-federal public buildings, and Cox v. [read post]
8 Jun 2007, 2:02 pm
Cox    Eastern District of Michigan at DetroitABORTION LAW HELD UNCONSTITUTIONALBOYCE F. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 10:30 pm
  Perhaps some die-hard students will take the time to learn more obscure aspects of the Fourth Amendment such as administrative searches and the law of satellite reconnaissance. [read post]
29 Mar 2007, 11:56 pm
This was in contrast to the situation in the Court of Appeals' recent Cox decision, where the issue had been advanced below.The opinion is available in PDF format. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 1:53 pm
In today's LA Times, University of Illinois Professor Dennis Baron has this op-ed dissecting the grammar of the Second Amendment, which the D.C. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 8:17 am
.: New and Amended Actions Microsoft has filed or amended four civil suits in the United States: • Microsoft Corp. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 6:16 am
The two issues to review were (1) whether a police encounter, in which a uniformed officer approached Petitioner on the street claiming that he "loosely fit" the description of the perpetrator of a recent string of robberies, asked Petitioner for identification, and ran a check on his identification, constituted an illegal stop in violation of the Fourth Amendment, and (2) whether a police officer's subsequent discovery of an outstanding arrest warrant represented an… [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 12:08 pm
The appeals court agreed with the Michigan attorney general, Republican Mike Cox, who said in a March 2005 opinion that same-sex benefits are not allowed in a state that does not recognize same-sex unions.Thanks to How Appealing, here is the Michigan opinion in National Pride v. [read post]