Search for: "D Booker" Results 541 - 560 of 614
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jun 2008, 3:28 am
by Collin, Dallas and Denton County DWI Attorney Troy Burleson If you have been charged with a Collin, Dallas or Denton county DWI, chances are you were asked to do field tests by the officer who arrested you. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 11:51 am
Rose, No. 06-1642 A conviction for selling a firearm to a known felon and possessing an unregistered silencer is affirmed over claims of error regarding: 1) the jury's review of certain CD recordings; 2) prosecutorial misconduct; 3) the constitutionality, under the Commerce Clause, of 18 U.S.C. section 922(d)(1); and 4) jury instructions regarding his possession of an unregistered silencer. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 11:34 am
Vilches-Navarrete, No. 06-1942 Conviction and sentence for cocaine possession in violation of Maritime Drug Law Enforcement Act ("MDLEA") and conspiracy to distribute cocaine is affirmed over defendant's claims that: 1) the MDLEA is unconstitutional; 2) the district court lacked jurisdiction; 3) the district court erroneously refused to suppress evidence; 4) there was insufficient evidence to sustain his conviction; and 5) his sentence was unreasonable under Booker; and 6)… [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 11:34 pm
  Don't we think Booker or Blakely at least suggest that this kind of thing really ain't so kosher? [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 8:08 am
Phinazee, No. 06-5730 Defendant's sentence, imposed on a remand pursuant to Booker, for conspiracy to distribute crack and powder cocaine is affirmed over a claim that the sentence was substantively unreasonable because a downward variance was not large enough. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 1:50 pm
Sexton, No. 05-6412, 05-6415, 05-6416 Defendants' sentences for offenses stemming from the distribution of cocaine, imposed on a remand pursuant to Booker, are affirmed over meritless claims that: 1) the district court violated their Sixth Amendment and due process rights by using its own factual findings to calculate their sentencing ranges under the Guidelines; 2) the sentences exceeded the "maximum statutory sentence" allowable for their offenses; 3) imposition of their… [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 9:12 am
Reporters and their editors inevitably spend time on blogs, as do talk-show bookers. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 9:12 am
Reporters and their editors inevitably spend time on blogs, as do talk-show bookers. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 10:22 pm
, but I'd like to invite other prawfs to consider in the comments how they might have voted on these fascinating and, for now, quite important cases. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 1:50 pm
  For instance, I'd expect someone from the SG's office to argue White before the full Sixth Circuit. [read post]
25 Nov 2007, 8:01 am
This phrase would have created j/x in this case (although it is unclear why, in a post-Booker world and post-Plouffe). [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 5:45 am
State, 769 So. 2d at 986 .................................................................................................................7 Booker v. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 5:45 am
State, 769 So. 2d at 986 .................................................................................................................7 Booker v. [read post]