Search for: "D. Sharp v. State"
Results 541 - 560
of 752
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Oct 2011, 2:26 am
(1709 Copyright Blog) United States US General Controversial US bill targeting “rogue websites” introduced into House – HR 3261, Stop Online Piracy Act (IP Watch) (Excess Copyright) (Public Knowledge) (Public Knowledge) (EFF) US Patents New survey reports a sharp drop in NPE litigation success rates in the US during 2010 (IAM) Kodak board faces legal action threat if patent sale does not generate a “fair market value” (IAM) US… [read post]
7 Jun 2015, 5:24 pm
Supreme Court issued its 2010 decision in Morrison v. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 6:34 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: New Zealand Prime Minister announces s 92A ‘three strikes’ copyright provision will be scrapped (Excess Copyright) (Michael Geist) (TorrentFreak) (Ars Technica) (ContentAgenda) (Managing Intellectual Property) (Public Knowledge) (Excess Copyright) (IPKat) US: TomTom files countersuit against Microsoft claiming its Streets… [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:04 am
Over in the States, London-based solicitor Mark Lewis is working with Norman Siegel of Siegel Teitelbaum & Evans LLP and Steven Hyman of McLaughlin & Stern LLP to look into allegations of phone hacking in the US. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 6:54 am
D. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 10:39 am
D. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:07 pm
The review examines the overall state of the domestic news market, its financial sustainability, the role of digital advertising and social media. [read post]
30 Oct 2021, 11:09 pm
Happy Halloween! [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 1:54 am
As mentioned above, on 20 and 21 July 2022, the Court of Appeal (Vos MR, Sharp P and King LJ) heard the appeal Guardian News and Media v Executor of HRH Prince Philip challenging the decision to exclude the press from the hearing in September 2021 regarding the will of Prince Philip. [read post]
23 May 2008, 11:39 am
These theoretical upheavals are ultimately explainable only as a consequence of a sharp break with prior practice. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 1:08 pm
" That is why a unanimous Supreme Court was able to declare, in the 1982 case of U.S. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 1:00 am
: L’Oréal v Bellure (IPKat) Is the ruling in L’Oréal v Bellure against the law? [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 5:08 am
Tatro appealed that decision to the state Court of Appeals. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
I particularly appreciated Breyer’s sharp observation that a court “should never be influenced by the weather of the day but inevitably . . . will be influenced by the climate of the era. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 2:28 pm
Damoorgian, Jonathan D. [read post]
14 Apr 2021, 7:01 am
See, e.g., People v. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 6:27 am
Michael D. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:07 am
On November 14, 2014, in Priests for Life v. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 11:02 am
§§ 1541-48) to the Supreme Court’s 1983 opinion in INS v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 9:24 am
Sharpe, 347 U. [read post]
