Search for: "DURHAM v. DURHAM" Results 541 - 560 of 626
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2010, 8:39 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) AY, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 762 (27 April 2010) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Muuse v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWCA Civ 453 (27 April 2010) Homer v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police [2010] EWCA Civ 419 (27 April 2010) High Court (Administrative Court) Oxfordshire County Council, R (on the application of) v The Bus Lane Adjudicator [2010] EWHC 894 (Admin) (26 April 2010) High Court (Technology… [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 12:08 pm
Even in the Ninth Circuit.Notice, by the way, that Erwin's listed as from "Durham, North Carolina". [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 11:39 am by Sheldon Toplitt
Airport Authority.In The News and Observer Publishing Co., The Durham Herald Co., The New York Times Co. & Gannett Co., Inc. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 3:15 am by sally
High Court (Queen’s Bench) Veolia Water Central Ltd v London Fire & Emergency Planning Authority [2010] EWHC 208 (QB) (09 February 2010) Moore v Hotelplan Ltd (t/a Inghams Travel) & Anor [2010] EWHC 276 (QB) (22 February 2010) Rutherford v Seymour Pierce Ltd [2010] EWHC 375 (QB) (11 February 2010) Law Society of England and Wales v Secretary of State for Justice & Anor [2010] EWHC 352 (QB) (26 February 2010) High Court (Chancery Division)… [read post]
9 Jan 2010, 10:28 am by KC Johnson
The facts of the second case cited by the Durham attorneys, Francis v. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 6:29 pm by Matt Johnston
The problem is, for those unfamiliar with the case of Brady v. [read post]
30 Dec 2009, 3:05 pm by MacIsaac
Reasons for Judgement were released today by the BC Supreme Court, Vernon Registry, (Donnelly v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
Miller (Lewis and Clark), Judith V. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 11:56 am by Steve
As a longtime student of the law of the statute of limitations and the law of qualified immunity, I enjoyed reading Magistrate Judge Sargent's opinions in Durham v. [read post]