Search for: "David v. District of Columbia" Results 541 - 560 of 801
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Mar 2017, 1:18 pm by Adam Gillette
If one wants to get rid of the individual right to bear arms, one should work to repeal the Second Amendment rather than hoping that the Supreme Court will overturn its decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
21 Apr 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Or progressives might employ what Tara Leigh Grove calls “flexible textualism” to insist that the state attend to the functional preconditions for the realization of enumerated rights, as when the plaintiffs in San Antonio Independent School District v. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 7:24 am by Anna Christensen
  At the Volokh Conspiracy, Eugene Volokh looks back at a footnote in the Court’s 2008 ruling in District of Columbia v. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 1:35 pm by Gordon Ahl, William Ford
The hearing will feature testimony from David Glawe, the undersecretary of homeland security for intelligence and analysis; Christopher Wray, the director of the FBI; and Russell Travers, the director of the National Counterterrorism Center. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 1:07 pm by Gordon Ahl, William Ford
The subcommittee will hear testimony from David Schenker, the assistant secretary of state for near eastern affairs, and Michael Harvey, the assistant administrator for the Middle East at the U.S. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 12:44 pm by Abigail Thernstrom
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit echoes this point in a number of decisions. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 3:20 pm by Eugene Volokh
The Supreme Court concluded in District of Columbia v Heller, 554 US 570 (2008), that “arms” refers to “weapons of offence, or armour of defence,” or “any thing that a man wears for his defence, or takes into his hands, or useth in wrath to cast at or strike another,” id at 647 (quotation marks and citations omitted)—terms that cover more than just guns. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 5:00 pm by John Elwood
Seibert, in which a four-justice plurality opinion authored by Justice David Souter espoused one rule and Justice Anthony Kennedy, concurring only in the judgment, advocated another. [read post]
21 Apr 2024, 2:25 pm by Steven Calabresi
Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois, was appointed a Special Counsel to prosecute wrongdoing in the District of Columbia by Scooter Libby, then-Vice President Dick Cheney's Chief of Staff. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 9:27 am by Eugene Volokh
If some Justices think that Bruen or District of Columbia v. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 12:00 pm by Lyle Denniston
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit nullified Amtrak’s shared role in settling disputes over those rules. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 1:32 pm by Amy Howe
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, listened to his confirmation testimony and spoken with him personally at length. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 8:53 am by David J. Halberg, Esq.
Citing precedent in Florida, Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Pennsylvania and the District of Columbia, the court pointed to the legal doctrine of res ipsa loquitor. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 10:19 am by Jennifer Davis
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit [Parhat v. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 2:40 pm
Legally, there are at least three options for Congress.First, there's the remedy that Senator Leahy invokes: The House or Senate that has voted for contempt can certify that fact to the United States Attorney for the District of Columbia, "whose duty it shall be to bring the matter before the grand jury for its action. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 12:25 pm by Gordon Ahl
David Allvin, the director for strategy, plans and policy at the Joint Chiefs of Staff. [read post]
3 Jul 2020, 4:00 am by Cameron Hutchison
[3] David Abramowicz “Calculating the Public Interest in Protecting Journalists’ Confidential Sources” (2008) 108 Columbia Law Review 1949 at 1971-3 [read post]
17 May 2010, 4:07 am by SHG
  It held, also unanimously, that the federal government’s racial segregation in the public schools of the District of Columbia violated the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment. [read post]