Search for: "Davis v. New York State"
Results 541 - 560
of 1,189
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2016, 9:01 pm
House of Representatives v. [read post]
16 May 2016, 5:33 am
On May 19, 2016, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) filed an insider trading civil Complaint in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (“SDNY”). [read post]
6 May 2016, 3:37 am
There is no story about the lawsuit in the New York Times. [read post]
23 Apr 2016, 12:33 am
Scene V. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 11:23 am
District Court for the Southern District of New York in West v. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 1:33 pm
The New York Times has more. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 10:54 am
To avoid sailing across the Atlantic in winter, Jay delayed his departure until April 1795; upon landing in New York in May, he discovered he had been elected governor of the state. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 6:43 am
Since the CBS case was decided, the majority of states have followed New York. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 8:49 am
See, e.g., Davis v. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 8:49 am
See, e.g., Davis v. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 8:49 am
See, e.g., Davis v. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 9:01 pm
A court in New York, in In re Sebastian, agreed to allow a co-parent, already protected by New York’s marital presumption, to petition for a second-parent adoption. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 5:18 pm
” (Quoting Friends of Davis v. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 9:01 pm
In Buckley v. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 1:51 pm
Though the case, Davis v. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 7:19 am
Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of New York brought a parallel criminal action against Aronson and others. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 2:20 pm
The New York Times tells us that “the plan to halt the fighting does not include the Islamic State, which holds large swaths of territory in the northeast, nor will it apply to the Qaeda-linked Nusra Front, whose fighters are among rebel groups in many parts of the north. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 1:51 pm
Though the case, Davis v. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 4:10 am
This is the Court’s first exclusionary rule case since Davis v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 9:09 am
Davis, 126 F.3d 112 (2d Cir. 1997). [read post]
