Search for: "Davis v. Washington"
Results 541 - 560
of 1,112
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2011, 2:52 pm
First, it explained that a 911 call made during a domestic disturbance in Washington v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 10:07 am
July 17, 2012) [Eric's Note: Sam Bayard is an associate at Davis Wright Tremaine LLP in New York. [read post]
13 May 2015, 10:46 am
” Justice Garland recalled the Court’s precedent in “NBC v. [read post]
26 Dec 2018, 11:32 am
The Appeals Court reversed the defendant’s conviction of domestic assault and battery on a family or household member in Commonwealth v. [read post]
29 May 2010, 5:45 am
Supreme Court decisions is Dred Scott v. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 4:04 am
” Additional commentary comes from Noah Feldman at Bloomberg and the editorial board of The Washington Times. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 1:15 pm
In Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington v. [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 7:18 am
See Obsidian Finance Group v. [read post]
3 Aug 2006, 3:09 am
Indiana--the companion case to Davis v. [read post]
21 Apr 2024, 2:35 pm
App’x 364, 366–67 (9th Cir. 2018) (considering personal contacts between the appellant and state of Washington to find personal jurisdiction to enforce a foreign arbitral award); S & Davis Int’l, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 3:54 pm
Washington & LeeThere are some fun traditional rivalries in this batch: UCLA v. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 4:48 am
Coverage focusing on the confirmation process ahead comes from Sean Sullivan and others at The Washington Post; Susan Davis at NPR; Tom Lo Bianco at CNN; Jeff Greenfield at Politico, as well as Burgess Everett and others and Seung Ming Kim; Michael McAuliff at The Huffington Post, along with Igor Bobic and Jennifer Bendery; and Stephen Dinan in The Washington Times. [read post]
25 May 2018, 6:41 am
Monday’s order list was a striking illustration of how nice it is to have Washington on your side: Of the four relisted cases the Supreme Court agreed to review, the government (either as amicus or respondent) had told the court that review was warranted in three of them. [read post]
20 Nov 2008, 5:00 am
Further supporting that the Supreme Court will not retreat from Crawford is Davis v. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 3:50 am
In Banister v. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 8:35 pm
In its motion to dismiss the plaintiff’s claims, the university cited Davis v. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 8:42 am
Supreme Court has explained that statements made in response to police inquiries are not testimonial when the circumstances objectively indicate that the primary purpose of the interrogation is to enable police assistance to meet an ongoing emergency (Crawford v Washington, 541 US 36 [2004]; Davis v Washington, 126 S Ct 2266 [2006]). [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 5:00 am
Superior Court, 920 P.2d 1347, 1352-53 (Cal. 1996); Washington State Physicians Insurance Exchange & Ass’n v. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 12:05 pm
The State of Washington was still feeling the consequences this year. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 8:02 pm
The appeal is against the decision ([2017] EWCA Civ 1334) of the Court of Appeal (MacFarlane, Davis and Sharp LJJ) against the decision of Warby J on preliminary issues ([2015] EWHC 2242 (QB)). [read post]
