Search for: "Deal v. Edwards" Results 541 - 560 of 1,082
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2011, 10:11 pm by Joe Markowitz
In a case like the Barbie v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 3:35 pm by NL
Dobson & Ors v Thames Water Utilities Ltd (No 2) [2011] EWHC 3253 (TCC)This is very late as a post. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 3:35 pm by NL
Dobson & Ors v Thames Water Utilities Ltd (No 2) [2011] EWHC 3253 (TCC)This is very late as a post. [read post]
19 May 2014, 6:37 am by Venkat Balasubramani
First, they allege statutory violations, and this is sufficient under Edwards v. [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 10:00 pm
(IP Watchdog) (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) (Managing Intellectual Property) (Intellectual Property Watch) (BLOG@IP::JUR) (IAM) (Public Knowledge) (Patent Baristas) (PatentBIOtech) (Patent Docs) USPTO news: E-Commerce alert – tips to improve your e-filing effectiveness (Patent Docs) IP protection in the US fashion industry (IP Osgoode) (IP Osgoode) US General – Decisions California Supreme Court reaffirms strong public policy against covenants not to compete:… [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 4:16 am by Susan Brenner
’ Following the meeting, the City contends, Verberg and Edwards `continued to provide legal advice to Chief Harris and [ ] Assistant Chief Yahner’ based on the information from the PowerPoint. [read post]
28 Sep 2018, 7:49 am
, Tuesday TiddleywinksAuthor: Rose HughesPREVIOUSLY ON NEVER TOO LATENever Too Late 199 [Week ending 9 Sep] What does a no deal Brexit mean for trade marks and designs? [read post]
25 Oct 2014, 6:55 am by Benjamin Bissell
Michael Knapp shared news that defendants in United States v. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 2:12 am by John Hochfelder
The defense orthopedic surgeon in Espinal v. 1157 East 156th Street LLC, Edward Crane, M.D., appears to have been subjected to damaging cross-examination regarding his frequent testimony for defendants and his repeated minimization of plaintiffs' injuries. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 12:52 pm by John Lewis
Finally, section V of the new agreement, dealing with how arbitration proceedings should be conducted, contains a PAGA waiver but also addresses the potential invalidity of that waiver. [read post]