Search for: "Defendant Doe 1"
Results 541 - 560
of 46,095
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2009, 9:42 am
Does 1-38, then as SONY BMG Music v. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 5:37 am
February 1, 2008) [read post]
24 Feb 2008, 7:30 am
While an open door may 'invite the gaze of curious passers-by and lessen the reasonable anticipation of privacy in the home,' it does not alone justify an officer's entry into the home. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 4:41 am
Ohio April 1, 2011).* Also involving a typo on the same date is United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 10:00 am
Does 1-4,577, 736 F. [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 8:00 am
What the statute does not state is whether the defendant must be aware of the threatening nature of his statements, or if it is enough that a reasonable person would find the messages threatening. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 6:31 am
Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., 1-14-cv-07080 (NYSD November 25, 2015, Order) (Swain, J.) [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 7:13 am
[E]quity does not dictate that this Court allow [defendant's] belated challenge. [read post]
24 Nov 2008, 4:21 pm
Does 1-4, after the university advised the Court that it could not identify John Does #8, 9, and 14 to a reasonable degree of technical certainty, Judge Nancy Gertner deemed the letter a motion to quash, and granted it, quashing the subpoena as to those defendants:The Court treats Boston University's 9/23/08 Letter as a Motion to Quash and GRANTS the motion with respect to Doe Defendants # 8, 9, and 14. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 9:58 am
The true names and capacities, whether individual, corporate, associate, or otherwise, of Defendants DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, are unknown to Plaintiff who therefore sues said DOE Defendants by fictitious names. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 3:30 am
It provides the following rules for prison inmates: A defendant who is convicted of first-degree murder (720 ILCS 5/9-1) or terrorism (720 ILCS 5/29D-14.1) does not get early release and must serve 100% of their sentence. [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 11:37 am
The court noted that Booker invalidated § 3553(b)(1), which does not cross- reference § 3582(c). [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 6:07 am
As to Couture's civil conspiracy claim, the court held it "needs more work": [Couture] does not sufficiently allege an underlying tort [that defendants were allegedly trying to commit against her]. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 1:07 pm
Code §§ 35-47-2-1, -3. [read post]
18 Jan 2008, 3:40 am
Powell does not apply to § 2255 proceedings. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 5:27 am
This court does “not accept [defendant’s] argument that a key is necessary to establish authority over the premises. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 9:58 pm
However, in order to sustain a conviction under PL 265.02(1) - CPW3, instead of CPW4, the Court of Appeals ruled that "conviction" meant only that the defendant had pled guilty, not that there was a judgment of conviction.Therefore, after the defendant pled guilty, but before he was sentenced, hestood "convicted" of the crime he pled to and was therefore subject toharsher penalties for possession of a weapon.The Court did point out that recidivist… [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 4:16 am
“Nor does the record reflect that obtaining a warrant before the police seized the clothes was impracticable. [read post]
15 May 2013, 3:54 pm
John Does 1-23 Court Case Number: 1:12-cv-00841-SEB-DKLFile Date: Monday, June 18, 2012Plaintiff: Malibu Media, LLCPlaintiff Counsel: Paul J. [read post]
1 Mar 2008, 5:05 pm
Defendant was arrested at his door on a warrant, handcuffed, and put in a police car. [read post]
