Search for: "Defendant Doe 2"
Results 541 - 560
of 40,412
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jun 2010, 10:38 pm
They approached defendant to talk and he said that he had no luggage. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 4:17 pm
” The reasoning behind the required observation period is to ensure that the defendant does not disrupt the breath test by consuming alcohol or regurgitating. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 5:11 pm
Florida is the only state in the country that does not require the prosecution prove that defendant citizen knew the substances they were carrying were illegal. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 5:11 pm
Florida is the only state in the country that does not require the prosecution prove that defendant citizen knew the substances they were carrying were illegal. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 6:42 am
The defendants claim (1) that the discovery order constitutes a final judgment and therefore this court has jurisdiction over the appeal, and (2) that the court abused its discretion in permitting the 'imaging' of three personal computers used by Sylvester. [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 3:00 am
Defendants contended the local controversy exception was not applicable because defendant Massey and the unnamed John/Jane Doe defendants, who were allegedly citizens of Missouri, were not significant defendants. [read post]
22 Jun 2008, 1:10 pm
Court consolidates these matters under 2:08cv90. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 4:15 am
Finding that a defendant must have regular, physical presence of an employee or other agent of the defendant conducting the defendant’s business at the alleged “place of business,” the Court concluded that the Eastern District of Texas was not a proper venue for this case because Google does not have an employee or agent regularly conducting its business within the District. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 5:00 am
., No. 2:21-CV-05148-KSM (E.D. [read post]
28 Jan 2021, 8:00 am
The parties settled in mediation for $2 million. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 3:00 am
Although the defendant itself first invoked federal jurisdiction, the defendant submitted that the federal district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction because (1) the consumers’ claims were “barred” by the First Amendment, and (2) the consumers lacked Article III standing. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 3:41 pm
The district court judge who conducted the trial and who found the defendant guilty -- the judge who does not get reversed -- is Judge Snow. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 9:10 pm
Hotels.com, No. 2:06-CV-42-JRG (E.D. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 9:18 am
What Does This Mean? [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 12:35 pm
” “The law does not criminal every breach of contract, and will only call it a larceny when a party has effectively obtained property by a fraud to the detriment of the other party. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 12:48 pm
(Slip. op., at p. 2.) [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 10:12 pm
Screen shot from defendant’s Web site James Garcia’s having a tough time of it. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 11:39 am
R.C. 2953.73(E)(1) does not. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 4:06 pm
Plaintiff Canvasser Heritage, LLC executed two promissory notes in favor of the Defendant Fifth Third Bank. [read post]
7 May 2012, 4:56 am
The DOT’s citation of “some” of Defendants’ intrastate-only drivers, however, does not provide a sufficiently reasonable basis for concluding all such drivers were under the DOT’s jurisdiction and, therefore, exempt from FLSA. [read post]
