Search for: "Democratic Party v. Board of Elections" Results 541 - 560 of 595
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2017, 3:01 am by David Meyer Lindenberg
So there was a lot of interest in our family and in Whittier in the presidential election. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 4:24 am by Emma Snell
  DOMESTIC DEVELOPMENTS The Supreme Court announced yesterday that it would hear a case that could radically change how federal elections are conducted by giving state legislatures independent power, not subject to review by state courts, to set election rules in conflict with state constitutions. [read post]
22 May 2017, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Article 15 lays down a principle that applies across the board, from copyright to terrorism. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 6:59 am by Edith Roberts
Thapar argued for a rule under which the lower court would be reversed only if it committed plain error, even when neither party asks for that highly deferential standard to apply. [read post]
29 Dec 2019, 7:23 pm
. 'Graduates will be well prepared … to embrace 24/7 government tracking and social credit systems,” one commenter on the Slashdot message board said. [read post]
1 Nov 2008, 3:12 am
(IPKat) United States US General 2005 civil damages awards in state courts rarely broke $1M according to report released by US Justice Department (Law360) Changes to expert witness rules draws critisism (Law360) Collaborative law and intellectual property cases (The IP ADR Blog) Democrats victory could mean a new focus on civil suits (Law360) Election could drastically affect appeals court makeup (Law360) Ethics case survey: when is attorney-client privilege waived? [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 7:05 pm by Badrinath Srinivasan
I argue that Ontario lost a timely opportunity to devise a way to balance these competing rights and interests in a manner that respects all parties and protects the vulnerable. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Now, that is all wiped out and replaced by a clearer and more depressing picture of the man’s lifetime of work.In the short time since his announcement, we have learned that Kennedy allowed himself to be wheedled into retirement by a White House that warned him that, as a New York Times report put it, “[t]here was no telling … what would happen if Democrats gained control of the Senate after the November elections and had the power to block the president’s… [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 4:27 pm by Eugene Volokh
(As it happens, a couple of years later Logan was appointed and then elected to the Senate, and apparently tried and failed to get the Logan Act repealed.) 2. [read post]
29 May 2020, 9:04 am by Eric Goldman
As everyone knows (or should know), Section 230 isn’t limited to passive bulletin boards. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 12:40 pm by Benjamin Bissell
The decision by the government on Thursday “came as democratic lawmakers demanded anti-graft officers investigate a $6.4 million business payout to the city’s pro-Beijing leader, Leung Chun-ying. [read post]