Search for: "Diaz v. United States"
Results 541 - 560
of 639
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2008, 2:27 pm
United States v. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 8:22 pm
" where there is no physical taking of the property, no enchantment is possible under United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 10:51 am
(United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2008, 12:19 pm
In the meantime, the United States SupremeCourt took up the lethal injection issue in Baze v. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 5:22 pm
(See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 3:36 am
The Baze Decision On April 16, 2008, the United States Supreme Court issuedits plurality opinion in Baze v. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 11:08 am
" United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2008, 10:01 am
The Baze DecisionOn April 16, 2008, the United States Supreme Court issued its plurality opinion inBaze v. [read post]
22 May 2008, 5:42 am
United States v. [read post]
21 May 2008, 10:27 am
Judge Diaz noted the issue most recently in Regions Bank v. [read post]
17 May 2008, 3:10 pm
Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (2004)," will be decided next term by the Supreme Court in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 11:52 am
" Consequently, a state drug offense punishable by more than one year qualifies as a "felony drug offense," even if state law classifies the offense as a misdemeanor. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 11:44 am
Regions Bank v. [read post]
20 Apr 2008, 7:10 am
We have previously noted the long-running case of United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 8:48 pm
Executions in the United States had been on hold since last September, when the Court decided to take on the case of Baze v. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 12:01 pm
The First says that this is "troubling" but it isn't a "miscarriage of justice" under United States v. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 11:34 am
Rodriguez-Amaya, No. 06-4514 Conviction for unlawful reentry after deportation by an aggravated felon is affirmed where the time defendant was detained by United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement on administrative charges pending his removal was not detention "in connection with" his arrest, thus defendant's indictment did not violate the Speedy Trial Act. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 12:55 pm
See United States v. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 6:41 pm
State v. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 8:53 am
The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari in 8 cases this morning. [read post]
