Search for: "Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs" Results 541 - 560 of 3,914
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2013, 5:28 am by Rebecca Tushnet
” But that hypothetical plaintiff would also have to allege that, but for the misrepresentations, she would not have purchased the product she purchased, even though it had the lowest price. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 10:33 pm by Tomassi Law Associates
The lawsuit alleges fraud, racketeering and other counts, as the homeowners allege Direct Title Insurance “acquired property by false pretenses from the plaintiffs by falsely representing the home would be purchased free and clear of encumbrances and that a valid title insurance policy would be obtained. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 4:22 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Thus, UCL and FAL restitution is based on what a purchaser would have paid at the time of purchase had the purchaser received all the information. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 7:18 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Plaintiffs argued that the jury is vested with “broad latitude to infer proximate cause. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 8:46 am by Law Lady
Weekly D252aMortgages -- Capacity to sue -- Where plaintiff has failed to plead or specify in what capacity it brings suit and failed to define or identify nature of its legal entity, plaintiff has not pled capacity to sue -- Capacity to sue may be raised by motion to dismiss where defect appears on face of complaint -- Case dismissed without prejudiceVIEW OPINIONMortgages -- Foreclosure -- Standing -- Motion for final judgment of foreclosure denied -- Plaintiff that did… [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 3:00 am by Jay Levine
Had the defendants been sued by direct or indirect purchasers, however, there might have been a different result. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 1:43 pm by Beck, et al.
In Bridge, the Court found a sufficiently direct link between the alleged wrongful conduct and the plaintiff’s injury where the fraud was alleged to be directed not at the plaintiff, but at a governmental body(which gave the defendant a business advantage over the plaintiff).But luckily, the Court just slammed that “third-party fraud” door shut in the Hemi case, and made clear that plaintiffs were misreading Bridge if they… [read post]
28 Dec 2007, 12:31 am
Dec. 05, 2007):The question of whether purchasing a sponsored link associated with a plaintiff's trademark constitutes Lanham Act trademark use has not been addressed in this circuit. [read post]
4 Aug 2013, 5:09 am by Peter Mahler
On December 30, 2011, the sellers exercised the option and returned the plaintiff’s purchase monies. [read post]
16 Mar 2021, 5:15 pm
To succeed on such a claim, the plaintiff must show that the defendant committed: “‘(1) an unfair or deceptive act or practice, or an unfair method of competition; (2) in or affecting commerce; (3) which proximately caused actual injury to the plaintiff or to his business. [read post]
14 May 2023, 7:07 pm
That 1 May 2023 Complaint alleged wrongful termination of the plaintiff, in the course of the explanation of the circumstance of which Mr, Yu alleged as follows:10. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 3:19 am by Peter Mahler
In light of that election, the Court stays the dissolution proceeding and will set the matter down for a hearing to determine the fair value of Plaintiff’s shares in Mana, to facilitate Feldman’s purchase of those shares as the parties are unable to agree on the value of the shares. [read post]
26 Mar 2021, 3:57 pm by Javier Dominguez
Peter Prieto, a partner at Podhurst Orseck in Miami, is the lead attorney in the consolidated case representing the plaintiffs, who consist of corporations located in Ohio, New York, Florida, New Jersey and Pennsylvania that were direct purchasers of salmon and have suffered monetary loss. [read post]
29 Jan 2007, 11:38 am
Sjobring alleged that he was "directed in part through his lender [Wilmington Finance] to purchase a title insurance policy from defendant First American Title Company of Los Angeles. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 7:25 am by Dennis Crouch
”[x]  He took issue in particular with the RainDance Plaintiffs’ reliance on 10x Genomics’ promotional materials, adding that it did not appear the plaintiffs had “purchased one of [10x Genomics’] products to see how it actually works. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 12:58 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Their evidence: (1) they were direct competitors; (2) deposition testimony from plaintiffs’ executives that defendants’ statements caused plaintiffs to lose sales; (3) customer statements the district court deemed inadmissible hearsay; and (4) plaintiffs’ damages expert report and testimony. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 9:23 am by Nadezhda Nikonova and David Garcia
  There exist a number of more direct potential plaintiffs, including “health plans, patients, and their employers,” as well as the third party that ultimately purchased Providence. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 9:23 am by Nadezhda Nikonova and David Garcia
  There exist a number of more direct potential plaintiffs, including “health plans, patients, and their employers,” as well as the third party that ultimately purchased Providence. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 7:20 pm
The CFA is aimed at unlawful sales and advertising practices designed to induce consumers to purchase merchandise or real estate. [read post]