Search for: "Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs"
Results 541 - 560
of 3,914
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Aug 2021, 11:30 am
Commercial advertising or promotion: “[W]hile it is true that Plaintiffs’ letters do not directly market their own DONNATAL products, it is undeniable that Plaintiffs sent the letters to prevent the recipients from purchasing Defendants’ products, which would therefore influence consumers to buy Plaintiffs’ products instead. [read post]
20 Aug 2021, 11:28 am
Therefore, Haehl is seeking damages for direct copyright infringement in violation of 17 U.S.C. [read post]
20 Aug 2021, 10:21 am
This was the case here; plaintiff did not suffer diversion of trade, which is “direct” injury by reason of deceived consumers. [read post]
20 Aug 2021, 4:00 am
Two ethics experts disagreed over whether the bond purchases could cause conflict-of-interest issues in the agency’s top ranks. [read post]
19 Aug 2021, 12:21 pm
Contracts -- Asset purchase agreements -- Assumption of debt -- Action alleging that defendant had assumed debt which was secured by equipment defendant purchased as part of APA -- Error to enter summary judgment in favor of plaintiff where plaintiff did not refute defendant's affirmative defense that plaintiff failed to state a cause of action against it -- Although plaintiff alleged that defendant assumed debtor's obligations… [read post]
19 Aug 2021, 8:45 am
Plaintiff further testified that he had purchased a vehicle for the parties older child and paid for the child’s auto insurance, which he wanted Defendant to contribute towards. [read post]
19 Aug 2021, 8:45 am
Plaintiff further testified that he had purchased a vehicle for the parties older child and paid for the child’s auto insurance, which he wanted Defendant to contribute towards. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 10:23 am
” A plaintiff does not qualify as a “consumer” if they do not purchase a product for consumption. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 9:51 am
Congratulations to Alan Gura, who represented the plaintiff, and who got the plaintiff a good deal more than many might have expected. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 9:08 am
Aug. 10, 2021) BONUS: Plaintiffs allege that the marketing rights that Stevens and Hughes purchased from Google and Facebook directed searches for the Blaux brand to https://www.shopezcoolbreeze.com/, where Stevens and Hughes sold products that competed with the Blaux portable air conditioner. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 3:21 pm
Change in brand strength mediates purchase choice. [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 2:47 pm
The plaintiff purchased shares of Gig3 in August 2020. [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 2:23 pm
That was enough for direct liability. [read post]
6 Aug 2021, 4:00 am
But if the officials want to keep gifts that are over that price, they must purchase them. [read post]
5 Aug 2021, 7:14 am
“Direct purchaser class decertified in Zetia pay-for-delay suit”: Brendan Pierson of Reuters has this report on a ruling that the U.S. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 5:15 am
The lawsuit, which now includes 196 plaintiffs, is currently awaiting the approval of class certification, but more and more people are joining it with each passing month. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 3:47 pm
The advocacy groups seek to intervene as defendants with a direct interest in defending the final rule. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 8:24 am
In this case, the Court found there was some causal connection between the criminal charges and the direction to test for and monitor coal dust, and it held that the pollution exclusion applied to preclude coverage of the plaintiffs’ claims. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 2:44 pm
A copy of the plaintiffs’ complaint can be found here. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
If there’s a problem with that registration statement, those early purchasers will be able to advance Section 11 claims. [read post]
