Search for: "Doe Governmental Units 1-5" Results 541 - 560 of 1,466
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Apr 2019, 9:01 am by Mark Theodore
  But, most other governmental mandates are not so clearcut, and any discretion that exists as to  their implementation must be bargained. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 2:35 pm
 The Circuit Court denied en banc review by a 5-4 vote. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 3:05 pm by Eugene Volokh
Such content-based regulation "will be upheld only if necessary to serve a compelling governmental interest and narrowly drawn to achieve that end. [read post]
22 Aug 2019, 5:10 pm
It is in that context that many have been following the shifting positions of governmental actors and other stakeholders in response to the social protests that have occurred in Hong Kong since June 20919. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 8:11 am by Marty Lederman
Option No. 1:  The Constitution permits states to limit marriage only to opposite-sex couples. [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 7:35 pm
  That problem is connected to the question--who does the representative represent? [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 5:03 pm by INFORRM
However, this interpretation does not appear to be consistent with the purpose of the third sentence of Article 10(1). [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 2:17 pm by Nicole Kellner-Swick
However, the public employers are not required to bargain on any subject reserved to the management and direction of the governmental unit, even if the subject affects wages, hours, and terms and conditions of employment. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 11:15 am by Logan Castellanos
The United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), which came into effect on July 1, 2020, continued this era of thriving corn trade. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 11:15 am by Logan Castellanos
The United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), which came into effect on July 1, 2020, continued this era of thriving corn trade. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am by Public Employment Law Press
Employee B, however, was permanently appointed on March 1 of the same year, while Employee A was permanently appointed a month later, on April 1.Under the terms of the Local 788 collective bargaining agreement A would have greater seniority for layoff purposes than B. [read post]