Search for: "Doe v. Doe, III." Results 541 - 560 of 10,831
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Aug 2023, 9:05 pm by Sri Medicherla
Supreme Court’s recent ruling in Sackett v. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 8:25 pm by Sri Medicherla
Supreme Court’s recent ruling in Sackett v. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 12:25 pm by Lawrence Solum
Part III applies these four aspects of common good constitutionalism, in roughly reverse order, to pending issues of Second Amendment doctrine after New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n v. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 1:56 pm by Kevin LaCroix
[v] Of course this will create a question as to what terms with certain investors will or will not have a material negative impact on other investors. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 10:56 am by Adam Schurle and Tori Roessler
A facility will be disqualified and lose its allocation if one of the following occurs prior to or upon the facility being placed in service: (i) location of the facility changes, (ii) the net output increases to 5MW (AC) or more or the nameplate capacity decreases by the greater of 2 kW or 25% of the capacity limitation awarded (AC for wind, DC for solar), (iii) the facility can no longer satisfy the financial benefits requirement, if applicable, (iv) the eligible property that is part of… [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 7:35 am by Alexis Boaz
  The TMA III decision does not directly impact state surprise billing dispute resolution processes. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 7:43 pm by Chukwuma Okoli
  Drawing upon the interview data, Penasthika states the reasons for foreign law not being applied in the Indonesian courts, as follows: ‘(i) it is difficult to delve into a foreign law; (ii) it is hard to apply a foreign law correctly; (iii) Indonesian judges are not trained to settle disputes governed by foreign law; (iv) the law of civil procedure in Indonesia does not provide clear rules regarding disputes involving foreign elements, such as foreign party or foreign… [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 4:00 am by Unknown
According to the SEC, the rule does not require companies to state opinions, although a company can make a factual disclosure that references a subjective opinion.Moreover, the SEC asserted that disclosing the reasons for engaging in regulated market activity (i.e., conducting a share buyback) are inherently “non-ideological” and, thus, uncontroversial. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 1:53 pm by Katitza Rodriguez
This is Part V in EFF’s ongoing series about the proposed UN Cybercrime Convention. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 7:01 am by Maksym Vishchyk
” Second, combatant’s privilege does not preclude prosecution for ordinary crimes unrelated to war, e.g., homicide, drug-trafficking, robberies and “pre-capture terrorist offenses not related to the conflict” (Martinez (2019) 83 referring to U.S. v. [read post]