Search for: "Doe v. Sullivan"
Results 541 - 560
of 1,710
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Apr 2018, 1:32 pm
For example, Scalia penned a famously scathing dissent to the majority’s ruling in the 2008 case of Boumediene v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 2:05 pm
Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964), and its progeny. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 11:19 am
Sullivan v Gray, 117 MichApp 476, 324 NW2d 58 (1982). [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:29 am
Sullivan, 559 N.W.2d 740, 747 (Neb. 1997) (dictum), followed in Nolan v. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 10:19 am
Sullivan and hiQ v. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 5:00 am
But the Supreme Court, in its 1977 decision in Zacchini v. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 10:59 am
Does 5 Pointz, a.k.a. the “world’s largest open-air aerosol museum”, fulfil the standard of recognized stature? [read post]
18 Mar 2018, 2:50 pm
Sullivan, Facebook's case is analogous to Dun and Bradstreet v. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 12:42 am
According to corporate finance experts at the law firm of Sullivan and Cromwell, the 2011 SEC CF Guidance jump-started a new era of cyber-disclosure in public company filings, which most public companies have now already integrated into their SEC disclosure processes: “Following the [2011 SEC CF Guidance’s] Release, many public companies included additional cybersecurity-related disclosures in their annual and quarterly reports, often in the form of risk factors, as well… [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 7:45 am
Sullivan’s Court provides general legal information only, is not intended as legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 3:15 am
Kat friends Nina O'Sullivan and Victoria Wilson from Mishcon de Reya in London report on these developments. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 11:33 am
However, plaintiffs’ attorney Keith Sullivan of Sullivan & Galleshaw, LLP, does not hold Mother Nature solely responsible for the losses. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 3:35 am
There is a case that dates back to 1939 (Sullivan v. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
”Citing Harlow v. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 3:56 am
See also Hearst Corp. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
At the same time, courts recognize that every disciplinary situation is different and are pre-disposed to accord “much deference” to the employer’s determination regarding the penalty to be imposed [Ahsaf v Nyquist, 37 NY2d 182], especially with respect to quasi-military organizations such as a police department or a similar law enforcement agency [Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32].In Gradel v Sullivan Co. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 4:05 pm
Sullivan 376 U.S. 254 (1964) . [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 8:00 am
Sullivan v. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 5:00 am
In Kokesh v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 4:31 am
Nor does it suggest that anyone is better, or worse, than the other for being different. [read post]
