Search for: "Does 1 - 23" Results 541 - 560 of 15,311
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Dec 2007, 6:35 am
Plaintiff's expert, a professional engineer whose opinion is unrefuted, said that the boards, which had been leaning against the wall, were inherently unstable and unsafely stored, in violation of Industrial Code (12 NYCRR) § 23-2.1(a)(1). [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 2:45 am by Jessica Kroeze
Whilst it might be assumed that claim 1 as filed on 23 April 2012 was the subject of the telephone consultation of 15 May 2012, there is no indication that the outstanding deficiencies were discussed in substance and the contested decision does not refer to the telephone consultation at all. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 6:03 am by Rich Worf
The post Does Due Process Limit Aggregate Statutory Damages in Class Actions? [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 10:15 am by Unknown
Territorial Integrity, Necessity and the Determinative Function of the General Assembly," Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law, vol. 23 (2020; published 2022) [preprint]"Migration and Refugees in International Law," The Lawyer Quarterly, vol. 1, no. 1 (2022) [full-text]"Refoulement as Pandemic Policy," Washington International Law Journal (Forthcoming, 2022) [full-text]- Includes a focus on the US. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 3:18 pm by Matt Danzer
However, even if they did not exist, because the defense does not contest one of the five aggravating factors, and that factor alone would authorize the death penalty, consideration of the other four factors could not increase the punishment and so does not run afoul of the Ex Post Facto Clause. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 8:49 am by Robert Chesney
Day 1 (Tuesday October 23) 8:30-10:00           Session 1: Foundations and investigations a. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal The Quiet Way Democrats Hope to Expand Their Power at the State Level DNyuz – Nick Corasaniti (New York Times) | Published: 2/20/2024 Locked out of power on the U.S. [read post]
5 Jan 2008, 5:12 am
Plaintiff's wrongful arrest claim does not imply the invalidity of his conviction, so it is not barred by Heck's fn. 7. [read post]