Search for: "Does 1-20 inclusive"
Results 541 - 560
of 1,609
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2017, 4:29 pm
That being said, this requirement does not apply if the employee has unlawfully taken the employer’s property or already breached the non-compete, a non-solicit, an anti-piracy/no-raid covenant, a confidentiality agreement, or a fiduciary duty; Non-compete agreements would not be enforceable against (1) employees who are not exempt under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. [read post]
31 Jan 2008, 11:24 am
It is now a misdemeanor punishable by up to three years in prison, but it does not require inclusion on the state's sex offender registry. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 1:03 pm
As Ed points out, if the dividend and capital gains rate rose from 15% to 20% (which also has a good chance of happening), then there'd be an odd neutrality under some circumstances.Case 1, earn $100 through a corporation, leaving $75 after corporate tax. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 11:15 am
," PERCEPTIONS: Journal of International Affairs, vol. 25, no. 1 (2020) [full-text]"Data Collection: Lessons Learned from the Covid-19 Pandemic in Rohingya Refugee Camps, Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh," Alternative Humanitaires = Humanitarian Alternatives, no. 15 (Nov. 2020) [open access] "Do No Harm? [read post]
3 Dec 2022, 7:08 am
The present law does not prevent anyone to say and publish whatever they like, including criticisms of the Central Authorities and the Government of HKSAR in any form, provided that they do so without a seditious intention. [read post]
20 Jul 2013, 10:39 am
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2013) In his 2004 Storrs Lecture, Gunther Teubner asked:how is constitutional theory to respond to the challenge arising form three current major trends—digitization, privatization and globalization—for the inclusion/exclusion problem? [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 2:48 am
Working style in this sense has been the subject of both the foundational paragraphs (¶¶ 1-8) and those establishing the CCP's line (¶¶ 9-13). [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 10:53 am
20. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 12:16 am
By my count, 12 for-profit education companies were sued during 2010, all of them after August 1, 2010. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 4:10 pm
(p. 20; 29 C.F.R. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 5:25 am
” The CMCR noted that the mandate rule is a more powerful version of the law-of-the-case doctrine, in which a lower court does not have the authority to deviate from a superior appellate court’s mandate. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 10:09 am
Wednesday, November 25, 2020, at 1:00 p.m.: Lawfare Live will host a conversation with the editors. [read post]
6 Aug 2022, 11:55 pm
Further updating is in progress although it should be noted that inclusion does not equate to endorsement f the views expressed – only the legal issue in question. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 12:29 pm
Opinion delivered: March 20, 2015. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 8:09 pm
Consider, for example, an inventor who publicly discloses a fuel consisting of 80% gasoline and 20% ethanol. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:14 am
In particular, the “Times” says that the Court of Appeal failed to follow Jameel (para 20a) wrongly held that the inclusion in the article of details of the information being investigated by the police was fatal to the Reynolds defence (para 20c) and misapplied the Reynolds requirement of verification, setting a standard that was too high and wrong in law (para 20(d)). [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:26 am
In particular, the “Times” says that the Court of Appeal failed to follow Jameel (para 20a) wrongly held that the inclusion in the article of details of the information being investigated by the police was fatal to the Reynolds defence (para 20c) and misapplied the Reynolds requirement of verification, setting a standard that was too high and wrong in law (para 20(d)). [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:14 am
In particular, the “Times” says that the Court of Appeal failed to follow Jameel (para 20a) wrongly held that the inclusion in the article of details of the information being investigated by the police was fatal to the Reynolds defence (para 20c) and misapplied the Reynolds requirement of verification, setting a standard that was too high and wrong in law (para 20(d)). [read post]
8 Nov 2014, 3:02 pm
Introduction 1. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 11:30 pm
" The decision does not mention the mandatory provision in § 409(a) of the New York LLC Law imposing on managers an obligation to "perform his or her duties as a manager . [read post]
