Search for: "Does 1-88"
Results 541 - 560
of 2,111
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jan 2022, 5:28 am
” “The complaint, as augmented by the affidavit of Singh submitted in opposition to the defendants’ motion to dismiss, sufficiently stated a cause of action for legal malpractice (see CPLR 3211[a][7]; Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87-88; Doe v Ascend Charter Schs., 181 AD3d 648, 649-650). [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 12:59 pm
., 718 F.2d 88, 96 (3d Cir.1983); United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2021, 11:14 pm
In particular, the court considered that the application was not filed by a foreign representative for the purposes of Article 15(1). [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 3:01 pm
Once this evidence is available, post-published evidence may be taken into account to back up these findings (see decision T 609/02 [9]). [5] The application does not provide any experimental data proving that an adenovirus of claim 1 is able to replicate in cells having an activated Ras-pathway but not in normal cells. [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 11:43 pm
Held:1. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 8:12 am
Law on the High Seas As long as the United States does not (1) unilaterally seize ships or cargoes in another state’s territorial waters or (2) seize foreign vessels on the high seas, it has a clear domestic statutory basis for the seizures that appears consistent with domestic precedent and international legal principles as construed in U.S. courts. [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 5:01 pm
It does not depend on [the fact] that the patent specification has been published (see point [6] of the reasons).2. [read post]
19 Jan 2007, 4:01 pm
" In that light, ten questions for the (Rump) Group of 88: 1.) [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 8:33 am
or(b) must the Community design court rely on national law governing designs in accordance with Article 88(2) ["On all matters not covered by this Regulation, a Community design court shall apply its national law, including its private international law" -- but Art. 14(1) does apply so there should be no need to lose sleep over this, surely?] [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 3:01 pm
A 69(1) relates to the extent of protection conferred by a European patent of patent application. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 6:31 am
, 438 S.W.3d 1, 3-4 (Tex. 2014). [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 6:31 am
, 438 S.W.3d 1, 3-4 (Tex. 2014). [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 10:07 am
The legislation is supported by the egg industry and animal welfare groups, and expressly does not affect any other livestock sector or food product other than eggs. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 2:44 pm
EOIR received 166 complaints concerning 88 Judges. [read post]
12 Jul 2009, 8:01 am
Clark, 434 F.3d 684, 687-88 (4th Cir. 2006)). [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 9:44 pm
EOIR received 166 complaints concerning 88 Judges. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 2:44 pm
EOIR received 166 complaints concerning 88 Judges. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 2:44 pm
EOIR received 166 complaints concerning 88 Judges. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 3:47 am
Prosecuting an individual for an uttering threat charge does not require a copious amount of evidence, rather, such cases often revolve around whether the judge believes the complainant’s allegations and whether the accused was intentionally making the threat. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 2:17 am
In addition, it does not say what it means by “in and of itself”, does it mean prima facie? [read post]
