Search for: "Does 1-96"
Results 541 - 560
of 2,165
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
Cir. 2021); In re Sealed Case, 931 F.3d 92, 96 (D.C. [read post]
3 Apr 2010, 11:00 am
[9] As regards the lower standard of care for assistants as mentioned in point 6(1) above, the jurisprudence of the Boards of Appeal (J 5/80; T 191/82; T 43/96) only excuses under A 122(1) a singular mistake or error of the employee when this person had been suitable selected, properly instructed and reasonably supervised. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 8:19 am
The petitioner denied any relevance of the case law quoted by the Board (R 12/09 and T 1028/96). [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 8:19 am
The petitioner denied any relevance of the case law quoted by the Board (R 12/09 and T 1028/96). [read post]
12 Jun 2007, 8:58 am
The problem with the Second Department's decision, as I see it, is if a 1% chance of a particular event from happening does not constitute an emergency, what does? [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 7:27 am
If the taxpayer does not pass the 'prerequisite' judicial tests, Congress's statutes 'do not even come into play.' Lerman v. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 9:39 am
Until it does so, however, such marriages are entitled to recognition in New York. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 2:50 am
Included on the list are senior Russian political figures, state-owned entities and a list of 96 “oligarchs”. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 2:46 pm
Dunnigan, 507 U.S. 87, 96 (1993) (“[A] defendant’s right to testify does not include a right to commit perjury. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 3:01 pm
However, in both examples the obtained organic layer was treated with the same acid, i.e. hydrochloric acid which differed only in its concentration (1% versus 1.8%). [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 7:34 am
In particular, the problem of Fry J's well-known five probanda in Willmott v Barber (1880) 15 Ch D 96, at 105, which has bedevilled this area in the past, is again at stake here because eg it was not known whether the Defendants' predecessor in title had made a mistake as to his legal rights (probanda 1). [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 9:09 pm
A denial of knowledge does not exonerate the accused of the offenses he is charged with in this matter. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 7:34 am
In particular, the problem of Fry J's well-known five probanda in Willmott v Barber (1880) 15 Ch D 96, at 105, which has bedevilled this area in the past, is again at stake here because eg it was not known whether the Defendants' predecessor in title had made a mistake as to his legal rights (probanda 1). [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm
The Board therefore prefers to approach the question applying more general principles, as set out below.Stay of proceedings: the general principles.[5.1] The purpose of R 14(1) is to protect the third party’s interests during entitlement proceedings, at least provisionally (J 7/96 [2.3]; J 15/06 [7]; J 20/05 [3]).[5.2] Whether or not the recording of a transfer literally constitutes part of the “proceedings for grant” (and thus falls within the express… [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 1:29 pm
An expert witness’s reliance upon a study does not make the study admissible. [read post]
24 Jul 2010, 11:00 am
This Article thus does not refer to the absence of a procedure but only to the absence of procedural provisions. [read post]
5 Apr 2022, 10:23 am
[xi] Iowa Code § 321.20(1); § 321.46(1). [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 8:16 am
The world's most famous black and white catIf you’ve got your head around what this isn’t about, here’s what you need to know.1. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 9:54 pm
Likewise, the scope of Antelope Valley's right to control the work does not in itself determine whether that right is amenable to common proof.Ayala, 59 Cal. 4th at 534. [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 3:55 pm
The answer to this question is that he most likely does. [read post]
