Search for: "Does I & II" Results 541 - 560 of 23,597
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jul 2012, 5:00 am by ipelton
This year, at least three sports phrases have made lots of general media headlines: (i) Linsanity; (ii) That’s a clown question, Bro; and (iii) Fear the Brow / Raise the Brow. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 5:11 am by Stewart Baker
Still, the court clearly does think it can force its views on not just the United States but the rest of the world as well. [read post]
12 Jul 2014, 7:11 am by FHH Law
Telcos are assured of getting no less than their frozen USF from Phase I if they accept model-based CAF. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 6:32 am
(collectively "Continental") filed a multi-claim lawsuit against iBiquity Digital Corporation ("iBiquity"), which asserted causes of action for patent exhaustion (Count I), patent misuse (Count II), declaratory judgment of patent rights (Count III), as well as several state law claims. iBiquity moved to dismiss Counts I, II, and III, arguing that patent exhaustion (Count I) and patent misuse (Count II) do not arise under… [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 2:30 pm by Kish Law
Poor reader, you unfortunately know that as an Atlanta-based criminal defense lawyer, I also like to ponder various existential issues, such as what does it mean to “know” a fact in a criminal case, and similar musings. [read post]
23 Nov 2018, 11:00 pm by Robert L. Mues
Divorce Does Not End Support For Sponsored Immigrant Picture if you will, a sponsor who has a successful career and is financially stable, and their spouse whom they have sponsored via an I-864. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 11:36 am by Wells Bennett
 No, Welsh says to Kammen, all I had was a thirty-minute in-brief with the new boss. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 3:53 pm
I previously blogged about the wedding ring issue, but I'm going to try it again, and this time I'll try to make it more direct. 1)You will absolutely get to keep your wedding ring in an Arizona Chapter 7 Bankruptcy case if you decide you want to do so;2)The only issue is how much dough you have to pay the Arizona Chapter 7 Trustee if you want to keep your wedding ring;3)In 98 per cent of all cases, the wedding ring is worth only $2,000 replacement value, so if… [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 4:57 am by Simon Lester
In summary, specifically on the aspect of the relevance of regulatory aspects in assessing “treatment no less favourable”, I believe the Panel’s analysis Article II:1, GATS resembles that of Article 2.1, TBT Agreement. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 8:44 am by Brett McDonnell
The core provisions for addressing system instability are Titles I and II. [read post]
I also comment on differences between the leaked draft of the Regulation and the final version. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 2:50 pm by Robert Chesney
Article II and the Libya Precedent If airstrikes occur, I’m pretty sure the argument will be Article II and only Article II. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 8:41 pm by Jon Katz
Imitation drug ("ID") selling does not insulate a Virginia criminal defendant from a conviction. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 4:54 am by Andrei Gribakov
I concluded that EU law does not appear to categorically prohibit California from applying for adequacy under the GDPR. [read post]
24 Dec 2015, 7:42 am by Natalia Gulyaeva and Maria Sedykh
The Law includes exemptions where a search engine does not have to comply – (i) information on events reporting a crime where the limitation period for criminal liability has not expired; as well as (ii) crimes committed by an individual where their conviction record has not been erased. [read post]