Search for: "Downs v. USA" Results 541 - 560 of 1,798
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2012, 9:39 am
So I can see preferring an "In Re" case over an "X v. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 10:24 am by Marta Requejo
From now on, one cannot file a claim for human rights violations against a corporation in the USA, simply because they have a presence in the USA. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 12:04 pm by Cormac Early
Khalil Abdullah of Highbrow Magazine  interviews Scott Jaschik of Inside Higher Ed about the potential ramifications if the Court strikes down affirmative action in Fisher v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 8:32 am by Isabel McArdle
The Government of the United States of America -v- O’Dwyer, Westminster Magistrates’ Court – Read judgment It seems appropriate, on the day when Wikipedia shut down for 24 hours to protest against US anti-piracy legislation, to talk about piracy (in the copyright sense) and what role human rights law has to play in the perpetual battle against it. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 2:08 am
You can separately subscribe to the Pharma & Biotech edition of the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review by subscribing by email, or selecting ‘all posts’ or ‘Pharma, Biotech & Chem’ for the RSS option at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: Plavix (Clopidogrel) - Canada: Selection patents upheld by Supreme Court: Apotex v Sanofi-Synthelabo Canada (Jeremy de Beer) (ipblog.ca) (Excess… [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 4:32 am by Edith Roberts
For USA Today, Richard Wolf reports that in Tharpe v. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 8:17 am by Jonathan Bailey
Supreme Court has requested that the Department of Justice weigh in on the Oracle v. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 11:33 am
In this second post of a series examining the self-made constitutional crisis engulfing the Episcopal Church (USA), the focus will be on the complications created by the ongoing existence and treatment of four pseudo-dioceses (San Joaquin, Fort Worth, Pittsburgh and Quincy; another may soon be forced into existence in South Carolina).These are all invited disasters; they need not have turned out as badly as they have. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 3:48 am by Edith Roberts
First up is Thacker v. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
Oracle USA Inc. and Fourth Estate Public Benefit Corp. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 3:54 am by Edith Roberts
Amy Howe analyzes yesterday’s argument in Monasky v. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 4:30 am by Edith Roberts
Securities and Exchange Commission and Kokesh v. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 12:49 pm
To my mind, the proponents of the cost-internalization approach now face substantial difficulties on account of the Supreme Court's recent decision in Philip Morris USA v. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 2:59 am by INFORRM
The Supreme Court of Canada has issued its decision in Google Inc v Equustek (2017 SCC 34). [read post]