Search for: "Duck v. State"
Results 541 - 560
of 752
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jul 2017, 7:30 am
United States (1 [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Class 46) India Chennai IP Appellate Board: Well-known trademarks - consumer recollection is key: Societe des Produits Nestle SA v Jai ram (International Law Office) Bombay High Court rules on the infringement of copyright in drawings: Indiana Gratings Private Limited & Anr v Anand Udyog Fabricators Private Limited & Ors (Spicy IP) Is ‘science’ essential for creating patent lawyers: some ‘general’ thoughts (Spicy… [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Class 46) India Chennai IP Appellate Board: Well-known trademarks - consumer recollection is key: Societe des Produits Nestle SA v Jai ram (International Law Office) Bombay High Court rules on the infringement of copyright in drawings: Indiana Gratings Private Limited & Anr v Anand Udyog Fabricators Private Limited & Ors (Spicy IP) Is ‘science’ essential for creating patent lawyers: some ‘general’ thoughts (Spicy… [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 12:28 pm
In Ziglar v. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 9:12 pm
V. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 4:52 pm
In finding for the Claimant, Mitting J stated “…The impression given by the postings to the ordinary reader was a significant and distorting overstatement of what had in fact occurred. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 5:00 am
(In some cases, like United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 8:20 pm
Notes for: --Marbury v. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 7:32 am
Beginning in the 1980s but picking up speed in 2011 in a case called AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 10:46 am
But with tort liability (potentially a lot of tort liability) riding upon compliance, it would become all the more critical for companies hoping to take advantage of preemption to have all their regulatory ducks in a row.On the legal side, it's important for defense counsel to think about how to approach FDCA violation claims in a preemption environment. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 9:44 am
— Anne-Marie Slaughter (@SlaughterAM) October 17, 2015 Putin v. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 6:30 am
With that said, the book provides insights relevant to analyzing the Court’s recent decision in Trump v. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 12:37 pm
Soldal v. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 3:00 am
(IPKat) Maximising IP and intangible assets: new report (IP finance) (Innovationpartners) Protecting developing countries through the Trips Agreement: What is the real state of play? [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 8:51 am
It’s Auntie BBC v. [read post]
13 Apr 2008, 9:12 pm
See Thoughts on United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 7:35 pm
Today was a banner day at the law office of Clark V. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 4:37 am
” An Ohio state court disagreed, ruling last year that Auto-Owners had no duty to defend G & K under the policy. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 4:53 am
(v) Talking on electronic communication devices is not permitted while court is in session. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 8:07 am
: (Spicy IP), Latin America: Merck Serono signs distribution agreement with Bristol-Myers Squibb for portfolio of established pharmaceutical brands in Latin America: (IP tango), US: Biotech industry growth to slow due to funding pressures and competition from biosimilars: (Managing Intellectual Property), US: House Commerce Committee posts responses to its questions on biogenerics; not surprisingly, the views run the gamut: (FDA Law Blog), US: Biosimilar debate heats up at BIO: (Managing… [read post]
