Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 541 - 560
of 7,356
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2023, 8:54 am
” Relying on an English case, the court quoted C. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 6:41 am
Gravel v. [read post]
20 Feb 2023, 10:12 am
But then in a federal breach of contract case involving a state-legal cannabis company (Siva Enterprises v. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 6:31 am
In Impression Products v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:59 am
The Bruen Court cited 45 Supreme Court cases, 22 Circuit cases, 3 federal statutes, 10 other U.S. government documents, 61 state statutes after 1900, 43 state/colonial/territorial statutes before 1900, 10 state cases after 1900, 28 state cases before 1900, 2 local laws, 1 state government document, 10 English statutes, 4 other English government documents, 6 English cases, 5 English treatises, 16 books published after… [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:21 pm
In Tracey v. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 2:10 pm
Speaking in English to a room full of French-speaking folks is unquestionably futile. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:00 am
L.M. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 7:00 am
Nokia v Oppo [2023] EWHC 23 (Pat) In a new development in the global dispute between Nokia and Oppo that spans seven jurisdictions across Europe and Asia, Mr Justice Meade of the English Patents Court has found that smartphone manufacturer Oppo infringes valid and standard essential Nokia 4G/5G patent EP2981103 on an “allocation of preamble sequences”. [read post]
Constructive Ambiguity of the Budapest Memorandum at 28: Making Sense of the Controversial Agreement
7 Feb 2023, 5:31 am
” And they reaffirmed the positive and negative security assurances to all non-nuclear states under the NPT previously made by nuclear powers, including Russia, the United Kingdom, and the United States. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 7:28 am
The case is United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 6:18 am
Subsequently, in the Decision on Immunity from Jurisdiction, Prosecutor v. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 5:49 am
Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Gonzalez v. [read post]
4 Feb 2023, 11:35 pm
BCZ[10] and Enka v. [read post]
4 Feb 2023, 6:49 am
Perhaps it will inform its work; more likely it will inform it of the state of mind of those willing and able to supply input. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 12:40 pm
The first case, Biden v. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 2:07 am
‘An English-only system was politically impossible. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 4:35 pm
State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 12:25 pm
Kaye v Lees (2023) EWHC 152 (KB) We’ve seen previous instalments in this matter here and here. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 11:00 am
United States v. [read post]
