Search for: "Ebert"
Results 541 - 560
of 583
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Aug 2007, 11:55 am
The "thumbs up/thumbs down" rating system that made film critic Ebert Roeper a television celebrity may soon be gone from TV screens everywhere, says DLA Piper attorney David Donoghue at the Chicago IP Litigation Blog. [read post]
26 Aug 2007, 6:03 am
It will be interesting to see whether the thumb ratings are a powerful enough mark to get Ebert the contract he is looking for. [read post]
26 Aug 2007, 6:03 am
It will be interesting to see whether the thumb ratings are a powerful enough mark to get Ebert the contract he is looking for. [read post]
24 Aug 2007, 10:37 am
Ebert,Prof. [read post]
22 Aug 2007, 9:35 am
Ebert is a registered patent attorney located in central New Jersey. [read post]
22 Jul 2007, 3:45 am
Further proof that Roger Ebert should gracefully retire before he damages his "legacy" (such as it is) any more than he has recently came out of his own mouth on Friday. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 3:21 am
I'm afraid that Roger Ebert has really, really lost it. [read post]
11 Jul 2007, 6:26 pm
Ebert, Comments, at http://www.uspto.govlweb/officeslpac/dapp/opla/comments/fpp_continuation/ebert.pdf [In FY 2005, RCEs were the single most abundant "continuing" form, 52,000 of 384,228 (13.5%). [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 9:25 am
Ebert, Festo, Foreseeability and the Wright Brothers, Intellectual Property Today, February 2004. [read post]
2 Jun 2007, 1:12 pm
Anyone over 30 no doubt remembers watching "Siskel and Ebert at the Movies" growing up. [read post]
26 May 2007, 11:26 pm
Ebert, great stuff, and something I thought about as well when reading descriptions of the books. [read post]
21 May 2007, 9:08 pm
Ebert appears to believe that Tom Carhart is a plagiarist who has claimed a novel theory as his own when it's something that has been around for decades and is nothing new at all. [read post]
11 May 2007, 10:57 pm
Ebert is a registered patent attorney located in central New Jersey. [read post]
9 May 2007, 5:25 pm
Petitioner KSR, in its brief to the US Supreme Court, wrote: The present litigation, soon to begin its fifth year, well illustrates how the Federal Circuit "teaching-suggestion-motivation test" has gutted 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as a meaningful defense to claims for alleged patent infringement, and has permitted "a class of speculative schemers ... to lay a heavy tax upon the industry of the country, without contributing anything to the real advancement of the art. [read post]
2 May 2007, 10:17 am
The following analysis is from Lawrence Ebert, a New Jersey patent lawyer whose blog IPBiz covers intellectual property news. [read post]
1 May 2007, 1:30 pm
This post is from Lawrence Ebert, a New Jersey patent lawyer whose blog IPBiz covers intellectual property news. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 12:38 pm
Ebert’s comment below for clarification.] [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 10:50 am
This analysis of the Court's decision is from Lawrence Ebert, a New Jersey patent lawyer whose blog IPBiz covers intellectual property news. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 9:52 am
Dennis Crouch of the Patently-O blog has these comments on today's patent decisions; Lawrence Ebert has this post analyzing the KSR ruling; Joshua Sarnoff weighs in here; Solveig Singleton posts her thoughts here; and Michael Barclay has this analysis. [read post]
26 Apr 2007, 1:32 am
Ebert, You Only Look Twice, 18, Intellectual Property Today (Nov. 2005). [read post]
