Search for: "FRIEDMAN v. UNITED STATES" Results 541 - 560 of 653
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2010, 5:00 am by Beck, et al.
Pa. 1985) (can’t tell what state’s law); Seiden v. [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 5:46 pm by Erik Gerding
Google v China: Do we know corporate social responsibility when we see it? [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 3:23 am
: Catnic Components Ltd & Anor v Hill and Smith Ltd (Spicy IP)   United States US Patents BPAI rules for ex parte appeals: Request for comment and notice of roundtable (Patently-O) Bilski and Warsaw share insights (AwakenIP)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC: False marking statute applies on a per article basis: Forest Group, Inc v Bon Tool Co (GRAY On Claims) (EPLAW) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) You say tomato... [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 5:50 pm by admin
Friedman ordered a lawsuit challenging a Bureau of Land Management roundup of thousands of wild horses in Nevada forward, but denied a preliminary injunction to stop the removal of horses, which is scheduled to begin December 28. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 5:46 pm by smtaber
Friedman ordered a lawsuit challenging a Bureau of Land Management roundup of thousands of wild horses in Nevada forward, but denied a preliminary injunction to stop the removal of horses, which is scheduled to begin December 28. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 12:01 pm by Anna Christensen
United States, Berghuis v. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 3:27 pm by Christopher Spizzirri
” Even more intriguing is that, although he did this sensitive work within the United States, there was nothing in the record showing that the United States government was aware of his activities, and he had no diplomatic or other official credentials. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm by smtaber
Further on in the blog post cited in Friedman’s column, he points out that “a firm response” to a low-probability risk “might impose costs and create risks of its own. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 7:11 am
Howard Friedman (Religion Clause) for the pointer. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 2:18 am
The Case against Consolidation       United States antitrust law aims to eliminate transactions that threaten the competitive process. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 6:42 am by Adam Schlossman
Times by Jeffrey Kayes discusses the possibility that Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano may weigh in on the Arizona statute at issue in United States Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]