Search for: "Federal Express Corporation v. Focus Corporation"
Results 541 - 560
of 564
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Nov 2008, 5:28 pm
In Cook v. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 9:34 am
Judge Hellerstein asks Rosenberg to focus on the specific bases for exclusion under Rule 14a-8. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 4:30 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: ACTA continues to be discussed and debated: (Michael Geist), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Public Knowledge), (Techdirt), (Managing Intellectual Property), (Public Knowledge), (Public Knowledge), (Public Knowledge), Apotex challenge to Acular LS patent barred by res judicata: Roche Palo Alto & Allergan v Apotex:… [read post]
14 May 2008, 6:52 pm
The database is heavily weighted to the 90s and to the era before the corporate scandals and before the recent increased focus on corporate governance and on executive compensation. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 8:00 am
Federal Express Corporation (C.D. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 1:44 am
I expect we will continue to see the courts express skepticism about expansive standing under the Lanham Act, especially where the plaintiffs are corporate customers or suppliers. [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 10:38 am
9:00 a.m. sesstion: Culture, Tradition and Language in Cross-Border Negotiations and International Conflict presented by Professor John Barkai, University of Hawaii; Andrew Aglionby, Baker & McKenzie; and, Michael Zacharia, Former Exec. [read post]
6 Apr 2008, 12:23 pm
- Ticketmaster Corp. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 12:08 pm
Similar opposition has arisen from a variety of foreign observers, all of whom express concern at the potential erosion of patent protections. [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 7:29 pm
In its recent unanimous decision in Sprint v. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 8:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included:German Federal Constitutional Court: unauthorised government surveillance of personal computers breaches individual’s right to privacy: (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 10:45 am
- Washington v. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 7:00 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included:Record labels sue Baidu over providing links to file-sharing sites: (Ars Technica), (Techdirt), (Out-Law), (IP Law360), (Copyfight), Merck’s Fosamax patent expires: Watson Pharmaceuticals to distribute authorized generic version, Teva and Barr also launch FDA approved generic versions: (SmartBrief), (Patent Circle), (In … [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 9:29 pm
The facts of the case are similar to a case decided by a federal appeals court, Rumber v. [read post]
15 Oct 2007, 8:11 am
A fine example is the letter recently sent by the Consumer Mortgage Coalition, a trade association of large national mortgage lenders and servicers, to Chairwoman Sheila Bair of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 6:31 am
Thoratec Corporation, 376 F.3d 163, 170 n. 12 (3rd Cir. 2004). [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 7:39 am
And, when the attorney involved is in-house, some courts require an additional or "clear" showing that the attorney was providing legal, rather than business, advice.Thus, corporations faced with broad discovery requests that focus on areas in which in-house attorneys have heavy involvement face an unenviable choice. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 2:25 am
Wade and Lawrence v. [read post]
16 Jun 2007, 3:51 am
Specifically, he expressed concern that the jurors would be so distracted by outside events that they would be unable to focus on the trial, thereby compromising petitioner's right to a verdict based upon the evidence. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 11:38 am
Cooper Indus., Inc. v. [read post]
