Search for: "Federal Insurance Co. v. United States" Results 541 - 560 of 1,546
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2013, 1:12 pm by Bexis
Three days ago, the United States Supreme Court unanimously upheld the federally-backed regime in Cafastan against the latest insurgent assault in Standard Fire Insurance Company v. [read post]
6 May 2013, 5:16 am by Susan Brenner
Brief of the United States U.S. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 8:13 pm
Supreme Court heard oral argument on February 28, 2008 in Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 10:08 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
Greenberg, the former chief executive of the American International Group, sued the United States Treasury and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York on Monday, contending that their takeover of the insurer in the fall of 2008 was improper and that the Fed breached its duty to A.I.G. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 10:08 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
Greenberg, the former chief executive of the American International Group, sued the United States Treasury and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York on Monday, contending that their takeover of the insurer in the fall of 2008 was improper and that the Fed breached its duty to A.I.G. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 4:22 pm by Friedman, Rodman & Frank, P.A.
More Blog Posts: Federal Court Awards Additional Damages to Plaintiff Based On Insurance Company’s Bad Faith, South Florida Personal Injury Lawyers Blog, published September 9, 2016. [read post]
7 Sep 2021, 7:05 am by David Klein
The proverbial battle of David versus Goliath is currently unfolding in United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 9:14 am by Dennis Crouch
Travelers Lloyds of Texas Insurance Company, et al., No. 17-330 (also raises Oil States issues) Petter Investments, dba Riveer v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 7:06 pm by MOTP
The arbitrator agreed with Rain & Hail that Jody James did not "timely present[] notice of its claim in accordance with the provisions of the crop insurance policy" and, further, "did not state a presentable loss" because crops from performing and non-performing farm units were commingled. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 5:00 am
United States, 361 U.S. 416, 423-24 (1960), overruled on other grounds by Burks v. [read post]