Search for: "Fields v State"
Results 541 - 560
of 11,741
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Apr 2012, 1:45 pm
Sharabani v. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 11:36 am
The Supreme Court will soon hear oral arguments in Pottawattamie County v. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 11:21 am
The states were required to yield to national supremacy (reinforced by Article V’s Supremacy Clause). [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 7:29 am
The vehicle rolled over into a soybean field. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 8:32 am
Gwinnett County, GA, v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 2:38 pm
Such "training" is as suspect as field sobriety testing anyway and is really nothing more than an officer's opinion. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 9:27 am
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit on Monday, July 26, 2010, in State of North Carolina v. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 1:32 pm
Unfortunately, the Supreme Court, with respect, picked the wrong case, when it decided State of Kerala v Mar Appraem Kuri on 7 May, 2012. [read post]
WA: State's failure to show how close defendant was to car was a failure of proof on search incident
20 Nov 2008, 6:05 am
State v. [read post]
7 Sep 2009, 5:14 am
In People v. [read post]
8 May 2018, 4:15 am
Allegations of the defendant attorney’s deceit “must be . stated with particularity. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 3:55 pm
State v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 11:07 am
Minsky v. [read post]
28 May 2009, 5:45 pm
For various reasons, the Supreme Court's 5-4 decision on Tuesday in Haywood v. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 6:50 am
Judicial Watch, the government watchdog group, announced today that its client, the Arizona State Legislature, has been granted permission to intervene as a defendant in the Obama Justice Department lawsuit (USA v. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 12:36 pm
The issue is whether the job requires a college degree in a particulars skill that is directly related to the job.The case is Solis v. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 1:56 am
In Waya the Supreme Court introduced the concept of proportionality to the calculation of confiscation orders and in R v Ahmed, R v Fields the Court introduced an extra-statutory rule which prevents multiple co-defendants from each being required to pay an amount equal to a jointly obtained benefit. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 5:53 am
See United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 11:09 am
Redfin and Galen had entered into a “Field Agent Independent Contractor Agreement,” which expressly stated that Galen would perform his services for Redfin as an independent contractor. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 5:45 am
Co-authors Lydia Webb and Rusty Tucker Until Monarch Midstream v. [read post]
