Search for: "Fields v. Eu"
Results 541 - 560
of 882
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Nov 2016, 5:01 am
The citation is R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the EU [2016] EWHC 2768 (Admin). [read post]
30 Oct 2016, 5:23 am
Scarlet v Sabam decided in 2011 is limited to situations in which the data controller is the Internet Service Provider (ISP) itself. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 12:01 am
It would be Silicon Valley Giant v. [read post]
A study of the European Parliament on the protection of vulnerable adults in cross-border situations
16 Oct 2016, 2:02 pm
The purpose of the study is to provide an objective evaluation of the potential added value of taking legislative action at EU level in this field, in particular where a cross-border element is present. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 2:03 pm
Darren Smyth discusses the issue of the UK leaving the EU without Parliamentary approval. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 5:32 pm
The US and EU regulatory frameworks are not that dissimilar, just that the US trails the EU in time. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 3:57 am
This is not surprising, given case law in other fields, but it is the first confirmation of this point in the e-commerce context. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 8:36 am
” In the future, “I think you will find a similar situation as between the UK and other EU countries as you currently have between the UK and non-EU countries”. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 4:04 am
Article 1(3) of that Directive limits the field of application of the directive to activities falling with the TFEU, thereby excluding matters covered by Titles V and VI of the TEU at that time (e.g. public security, defence, State security). [read post]
10 Jul 2016, 4:08 pm
The Hunton & Williams blog discusses the final version of the EU-US privacy shield. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 3:26 am
In providing for the author’s exclusive right to authorise or prohibit the reproduction and communication to the public of his works, those provisions also concern the way in which those rights are exercised by the author.While it is true that [the InfoSoc] Directive 2001/29 neither harmonises nor prejudices the arrangements concerning the management of copyright which exist in Member States, the EU legislature, in providing that authors enjoy, in principle,… [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 1:38 am
[and is important] particularly in fields where technological progress has a profound effect, such as copyright". [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 4:30 am
The difficulty with this is not that these diplomats (typically) lack professional credentials in those fields. [read post]
25 Jun 2016, 7:03 am
Isaac Park analyzed the Supreme Court’s ruling in RJR Nabisco, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2016, 4:00 am
https://t.co/k2wjCVWDWj -> Oracle v. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 1:30 am
Justice Green: "...challenged the Regulations upon the basis of international trade mark and health law, EU law, the European Charter of Fundamental Rights, the European Convention of Human Rights, and the domestic common law. [read post]
26 May 2016, 1:07 am
There is no assurance, come the inevitable human rights scrutiny, that courts applying ECHR Articles 8 and 10 or the EU Charter will draw a dividing line in the same place as domestic legislation.In fact the Bill creates different dividing lines between content and metadata for different purposes: one version for mandatory retention and acquisition of communications data from service providers and another for communications interception and equipment interference. [read post]
26 May 2016, 1:07 am
There is no assurance, come the inevitable human rights scrutiny, that courts applying ECHR Articles 8 and 10 or the EU Charter will draw a dividing line in the same place as domestic legislation.In fact the Bill creates different dividing lines between content and metadata for different purposes: one version for mandatory retention and acquisition of communications data from service providers and another for communications interception and equipment interference. [read post]
26 May 2016, 1:07 am
There is no assurance, come the inevitable human rights scrutiny, that courts applying ECHR Articles 8 and 10 or the EU Charter will draw a dividing line in the same place as domestic legislation.In fact the Bill creates different dividing lines between content and metadata for different purposes: one version for mandatory retention and acquisition of communications data from service providers and another for communications interception and equipment interference. [read post]
22 May 2016, 4:00 am
Google retrial: Judge Alsup's reality distortion field https://t.co/M9HvjuqjyW -> Runkeeper: A fitness app or a tracking app? [read post]
