Search for: "First Commerce, LLC" Results 541 - 560 of 1,672
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2010, 6:27 am
U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, April 13, 2010 Black Star Farms LLC v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 9:41 am by Eugene Volokh
The offending projectile was a "breaching" shotgun round manufactured by Safariland, LLC. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 10:01 pm by Dan Flynn
Deegan acknowledges that “there is conflicting evidence regarding when and how defendants Jack and Peter DeCoster first learned of the bribes. [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 12:30 pm by Nikki Siesel
See In re JJ206, LLC, 120 USPQ2d 1568, (TTAB 2016), where it was held that marks for cannabis paraphernalia, both vaporizing and delivery devices, were refused for lack of lawful use in commerce. [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 12:30 pm by Nikki Siesel
See In re JJ206, LLC, 120 USPQ2d 1568, (TTAB 2016), where it was held that marks for cannabis paraphernalia, both vaporizing and delivery devices, were refused for lack of lawful use in commerce. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:45 am by DONALD SCARINCI
., LLC: The Federal Arbitration Act exempts the “contracts of employment of seamen, railroad employees, or any other class of workers engaged in foreign or interstate commerce. [read post]
19 Nov 2022, 2:40 pm by Eugene Volokh
-EV] Appellants' compulsion theory cannot sustain their First Amendment claim against YouTube and Google…. [read post]
18 May 2009, 9:29 am
As pointed out in these  prior posts, the trend has recently gone against Google finding that using a trademarked term to trigger AdWords is a “use in commerce” which is the first element  in a trademark infringement claim. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 7:30 am by David McLain
 Wheat Ridge, Aurora, Broomfield, Centennial, Lone Tree, and Commerce City all have similar ordinances and others may follow suit. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 12:58 pm by Hank Fasthoff
The defendants are citizens of the Dominican Republic, so the first factor won’t be in dispute. [read post]
30 May 2017, 1:35 pm by Ronald Mann
” Uninfluenced by the claims in the briefing that more reticulated contracting structures are integral to modern technology industries, the court concluded that “extending the patent rights beyond the first sale would clog the channels of commerce, with little benefit from the extra control that the patentees retain. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 2:16 pm by Mitchell Jagodinski
Dubin 21-27Issues: (1) Whether the dormant commerce clause may be used to invalidate the application of a state’s neutral, non-discriminatory tolling statute to defeat the enforcement of a former resident’s stipulated judgment where there is no showing of any burden on or discrimination against interstate commerce; and (2) whether the dormant commerce clause applies to a state statute with no intended or demonstrated effect on interstate commerce. [read post]