Search for: "Force v. Facebook, Inc." Results 541 - 548 of 548
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jan 2021, 1:26 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The directors’ and officers’ liability environment is always changing, but 2020 was a particularly eventful year, with important consequences for the D&O insurance marketplace. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 5:08 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  The dust-up in Delaware over fee-shifting bylaws got started in May 2014, when the Delaware Supreme Court in the ATP Tours, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am by Editor
11 - Marc Randazza took time out from INTA to post about an interesting decision, holding that a domain privacy service can be contributorily liable for the actions of its customers, at least on these facts… 12 - Venkat Balasubramani also took time out from INTA to post about the fleeting nature of Facebook friendships, and how one court has taken judicial notice of that 13 - Moshe Glickman, author of the Circumlocutions blog, shows us one of the best uses for a towel. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am by Editor
11 - Marc Randazza took time out from INTA to post about an interesting decision, holding that a domain privacy service can be contributorily liable for the actions of its customers, at least on these facts… 12 - Venkat Balasubramani also took time out from INTA to post about the fleeting nature of Facebook friendships, and how one court has taken judicial notice of that 13 - Moshe Glickman, author of the Circumlocutions blog, shows us one of the best uses for a towel. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 8:31 am by christopher
http://twitter.com/HarvardLaw74/statuses/2248539070111498242012-07-13 19:23:27 HarvardLaw74: RT @PandoDaily: Fast Chat: Can a Judge Actually Force You to Divulge Private Tweets? [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 8:43 am by Kristian Soltes
The companies accuse the credit card behemoths of violating European Union and national competition law by forcing businesses to pay inflated merchant service charges. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 4:11 pm by Ken
For a sense of just how badly wrong Marc is about the scope of the First Amendment, consider the recent dismissal of the twitter-stalking case in U.S. v. [read post]