Search for: "Frank v. Frank" Results 541 - 560 of 7,045
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
  For good measure, the complaint throws in a reference to the Supreme Court’s recent ruling in West Virginia v. [read post]
29 Sep 2022, 10:22 am by Alan S. Kaplinsky
  Populus also filed a motion to stay all proceedings in the case pending the Fifth Circuit’ decision in Community Financial Services Association of America Ltd. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 1:34 pm by Michael Gordon
  On May 9, 2022, a Fifth Circuit panel heard oral argument in Community Financial Services Association v. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 3:34 pm by Gregory Schick
The Final Rules add a new section (v) to Item 402 of Regulation S-K that require certain public reporting companies to describe the relationship between the executive compensation actually paid by the company to its NEOs and the financial performance of the company over a specified time horizon and to disclose each of the following in a prescribed tabular format. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
This post was prepared for a roundtable on Can this Constitution be Saved? [read post]
The final rules implement the “pay versus performance” disclosure requirements mandated by Section 953(a) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act enacted in 2010. [read post]
3 Sep 2022, 12:58 pm by ernst
LaCroix, University of Chicago Law, on James Madison v. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
Securities and Exchange Commission, on Friday, August 26, 2022 Tags: Dodd-Frank Act, Executive Compensation, Incentives, Pay for performance, Performance measures, SEC, SEC rulemaking, Securities regulation Statement by Chair Gensler on Final Rule Regarding Pay Versus Performance Posted by Gary Gensler, U.S. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
All this suggests that providing pseudonymity to members of particular religious groups might violate the principle of the Texas Monthly v. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 8:50 am by Eric Goldman
I’ve written this in preparation for the Supreme Court appeal in NetChoice v. [read post]