Search for: "Franks v. Delaware"
Results 541 - 560
of 603
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jan 2012, 12:33 am
Delaware, the traditional forum for this type of litigation, arguably now faced with “market share” competition, is according to some under pressure to show that it is not inhospitable to these kinds of lawsuits, and even to support plaintiffs’ fee awards (about which see more below). [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 4:51 pm
., Delaware[9]), only to directors (e.g., Florida[10]), or only to “outside” directors (e.g., California[11]). [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 5:16 am
U.S. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 4:34 am
§ 504; see Frank Music Corp. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2024, 3:19 am
Supreme Court case Franks v. [read post]
23 Jul 2024, 3:19 am
Supreme Court case Franks v. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 8:47 am
” I guess the court did not find the testimony of Frank Church credible. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 8:47 am
” I guess the court did not find the testimony of Frank Church credible. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 8:30 am
The class B shares were held by the Stronach Family Trust, a family trust set up by the Company’s founder, Frank Stronach. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 9:18 am
Beyer’s article Estate Planning Ramifications of Obergefell v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 7:34 am
(Franks v. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 6:04 am
Pastuszenski, Goodwin Procter LLP, on Tuesday, July 18, 2017 Tags: California, Class actions, Jurisdiction, New York, PSLRA, Securities Act, Securities litigation, Shareholder suits, SLUSA, State law, Supreme Court CalPERS v. [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 6:03 am
Silk, Sabastian V. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 1:59 pm
" Micron Tech. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 5:06 am
Kim, and Sabastian V. [read post]
25 Jan 2019, 5:58 am
Katz, and Sabastian V. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 7:08 am
The Court’s holding in Christopher v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 4:24 am
What he’s referring to is the Supreme Court’s 1942 opinion, written by Justice Frank Murphy, in Chaplinksy v. [read post]
16 Aug 2021, 4:53 am
” (Kakollu v Vadlamudi, 21A-DC-96 [Ind Ct App July 26, 2021]). [read post]
9 May 2023, 9:01 pm
Voting stockholders, in short, deserve to be told in a frank manner whether the nominees are expected to work as part of a balanced board, or are in fact being nominated to unbalance the board and push it hard in a particular direction. [read post]
