Search for: "Franks v. Delaware"
Results 541 - 560
of 602
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Dec 2016, 8:47 am
” I guess the court did not find the testimony of Frank Church credible. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 8:47 am
” I guess the court did not find the testimony of Frank Church credible. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 4:34 am
§ 504; see Frank Music Corp. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 6:58 am
Delaware was established. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 1:50 pm
David TopolPrivate investments funds (hedge funds, PE firms, venture capital funds and the like) are a significant part of the U.S. economy. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 8:30 am
The class B shares were held by the Stronach Family Trust, a family trust set up by the Company’s founder, Frank Stronach. [read post]
16 Aug 2021, 4:53 am
” (Kakollu v Vadlamudi, 21A-DC-96 [Ind Ct App July 26, 2021]). [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 7:08 am
The Court’s holding in Christopher v. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 5:00 am
Although a New York case, the parties agreed that Delaware law controlled and that is what the court applied. [read post]
25 Jan 2019, 5:58 am
Katz, and Sabastian V. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 1:59 pm
" Micron Tech. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 4:24 am
What he’s referring to is the Supreme Court’s 1942 opinion, written by Justice Frank Murphy, in Chaplinksy v. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 9:18 am
Beyer’s article Estate Planning Ramifications of Obergefell v. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 6:04 am
Pastuszenski, Goodwin Procter LLP, on Tuesday, July 18, 2017 Tags: California, Class actions, Jurisdiction, New York, PSLRA, Securities Act, Securities litigation, Shareholder suits, SLUSA, State law, Supreme Court CalPERS v. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 5:06 am
Kim, and Sabastian V. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 7:34 am
(Franks v. [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 6:03 am
Silk, Sabastian V. [read post]
9 May 2023, 9:01 pm
Voting stockholders, in short, deserve to be told in a frank manner whether the nominees are expected to work as part of a balanced board, or are in fact being nominated to unbalance the board and push it hard in a particular direction. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 5:08 pm
However, other courts have declined to follow the Delaware courts’ lead. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 11:56 am
(1) Despite the State’s repeated use of “moped” to describe the defendant’s vehicle, sufficient evidence existed to establish that the defendant’s vehicle met the statutory definition of “motor vehicle”; (2) New trial required where trial court plainly erred in failing to instruct the jury on the definition of “motor vehicle” State v. [read post]
