Search for: "G & C Adjusting" Results 541 - 560 of 743
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Sep 2011, 7:41 am
The aforementioned dates were said to be the “worse case scenario,” absent something catastrophic (e,g. hurricane) or other major event/change. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 5:07 am
  I would disagree with such an argument, especially in light of subsection 3808(c)'s "it shall be limited to a determination of actual cash value and/or replacement cost" language. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 4:25 am by Dianne Saxe
Director, Ministry of the Environment   In the matter of appeals by Superior Fine Papers Inc. filed July 31, 2009, and by Cascades Inc. and Cascades Fine Papers Group Inc. filed August 7, 2009, for a Hearing before the Environmental Review Tribunal pursuant to section 140 of the Environmental Protection Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 3:02 pm by SteinMcewen, LLP
It is likely that the Director will soon exercise his new authority to adjust these fees so that PTO revenue matches spending. [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 9:50 am
(c) "Debtor" means a local public entity that may file for bankruptcy under Chapter 9. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 8:53 am
During 240 days, there is no INA 245(c) bar to adjustment of status. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 10:27 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
More focused arbitration – covering price-adjustment clauses – is common even in the largest private target bids. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 7:48 am by Staci Zaretsky
We suppose that the rankings methodology was adjusted to account for the recession, but at what cost? [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 10:48 am by NFS Esq.
  Hamilton asserted that PacifiCare payment records indicated significant amounts of the bills from plaintiff’s health care providers (the physicians who treated her and Scripps Memorial Hospital Encinitas, where she was treated) had been adjusted downward before payment pursuant to agreements between those providers and PacifiCare and that, under plaintiff’s preferred provider organization (PPO) policy with PacificCare, plaintiff could not be billed for the balance of the… [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
” (my emphasis)The present decision is such a post-G 1/07 decision. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
c) is multiplied by a factor including the damping ratio which may be set to any desirable constant or may be a variable calculated at the time of engagement or other convenient time to adjust the response of the control system in relation to a respective flight maneuver. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 8:19 am by Steven Hansen
`(C) PROCEDURES FOR GRANTING EXCEPTION-`(i) BURDEN OF PROOF- A party seeking an exception under subparagraph (A) has the burden of demonstrating that it meets the requirements of such subparagraph. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
In fact, the Enlarged Board of Appeal noted that, while numerous board of appeal decisions cited the earlier decisions defining this methodology, it was not aware of any divergence in this case law, suggesting that the boards were in general quite comfortable with it, and concluded that it would appear that the case law, as summarised in T 154/04, had created a practicable system for delimiting the innovations for which a patent may be granted (G 3/08 [10.13.2]). [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 6:08 pm by lsammis
A rate of increase that has slowed to some specified rate, usually less than about .003 g/210L per second. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 2:00 am by Kara OBrien
New Rule 202(a)(11)(G)-1 exempts a family office from SEC registration as an investment adviser. [read post]