Search for: "GMBH"
Results 541 - 560
of 2,541
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2022, 12:06 pm
In Covis Pharma GmbH v. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 11:42 pm
berlin brillen GmbH, Serial No. 79005455 (February 14, 2008) [precedential].Applicant sought registration under Section 2(f), apparently recognizing that a product shape cannot be inherently distinctive. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 3:18 am
Willmar Schwabe GmbH & Co. [read post]
5 Jun 2007, 9:48 pm
Otto Kern GmbH, Cancellation No. 92046167 (May 30, 2007) [precedential].Section 2(d): Petitioner's likelihood of confusion claim contained a fatal flaw: the OTTO KERN registration was more than five years old, and therefore this claim was barred under Section 14(3).Abandonment: Petitioner alleged that Respondent "has abandoned use of Registration No. 2432890" for bags and clothing. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 7:04 pm
DynaEnergetics GmbH & Co. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 5:39 am
In a robust judgment of 12 June 2014 in Martrade Shipping & Transport GmbH v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 1:25 am
The Commercial Court has held that an aviation contractor was not entitled to the value of aircraft engine parts that were being refurbished by a subcontractor because the subcontractor's obligations ended when the sub-contract was terminated.In Gamit Limited v Saudi Arabian Airlines Corporation and MTU Maintenance Hannover GMBH [2011] EWHC (Comm), the contractor, Gamit, entered into an agreement with the maintenance sub-contractor, MTU, to refurbish four jet engines owned by Saudi… [read post]
19 Jul 2013, 6:00 am
Defendant, Oldendorff Carriers GmbH & Co. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 7:36 pm
In Case C-314/12, UPC Telekabel Wien GmbH v Constantin Film Verleih GmbH, the Austrian referring court queried, among other matters, the relevance of the exact parameters of the private copying exception with regard to the interpretation of Article 8(3) of the InfoSoc Directive. [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 12:41 am
Ford-Werke GmbH, case no. 44 O 17132/21, over EP2248383 on a "method and apparatus for indicating deactivation of semi-persistent scheduling" (originally filed by Thomson)The case numbers indicate that both Sisvel v. [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 3:45 am
[Section 2(d) refusals to register STREAMLINE BOATS in character and word-plus-design form, each for (1) Boat hulls; Boats; Boats and structural parts therefor; Fishing boats; Fitted covers for boats and marine vehicles; Recreational watercraft, namely, boats and yacht (Class 12), (2) Boat dealerships; Dealerships in the field of boats and yachts; Wholesale and retail store services featuring boats and yachts (Class 35), and (3) custom manufacture of Boats (Class 40) [BOATS disclaimed], in view of… [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 4:14 am
Waterdrop Microdrink GmbH v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 3:19 pm
-GmbH durch die gefälschte Prüfungsbestätigung einerseits Kosten sparte und einen Zeitgewinn erzielte. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 8:41 am
Remuneration to shareholders for services to the VE-GmbH, for example as managing director, employee or lender, remains permissible. [read post]
8 May 2013, 7:00 am
In 1998, MIP Metro Group Intellectual Property GmbH & Co. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 7:41 am
Category: 103 By: Jesus Hernandez, Blog Editor/Contributor TitleSanofi-Aventis Deutschland GMBH v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 1:48 am
A quick lunch time post to let our readers know that the European Court of Justice's (CJ) decision in the German AdWord referral in "Eis.de GmbH v BBY Vertriebsgesellschaft mbH", in short: "Eis.de" (case C-91/09) has now been published. [read post]
Balancing freedom of expression against the right to private life - Kurier Zeitungsverlag v. Austria
24 Jun 2012, 1:37 am
In Kurier Zeitungsverlag und Druckerei GmbH v. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 10:34 am
On 12th February, the ECJ delivered its judgment in case C-339/07 (Christopher Seagon in his capacity as liquidator in respect of the assets of Frick Teppichboden Supermärkte GmbH v Deko Marty Belgium N.V.). [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 1:41 am
Early during the appeal proceedings, a first intervention was filed by a first assumed infringer, Bose Gmbh. [read post]
