Search for: "GORDON v GORDON" Results 541 - 560 of 2,589
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2019, 1:40 pm by Dr. Virginia Cervieri
Virginia CervieriThe Uruguayan Criminal Court of First Instance Specialized in Organized Crime has ordered internet service providers (ISPs) to block websites that retransmit sporting events illegally, thereby infringing the copyright to this content (Fox International Channels v. [read post]
9 May 2019, 3:56 am by Edith Roberts
” At Stanford Law School’s Legal Aggregate blog, Robert Gordon suggests that the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Lamps Plus Inc. v. [read post]
7 May 2019, 8:30 am by Scott Bomboy
Justice Willis Van Devanter made perhaps the most famous statement of these powers in McGrain v. [read post]
5 May 2019, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
No breach – after investigation 07454-18 Belcher v The Times, 1 Accuracy (2018), 12 Discrimination (2018), No breach – after investigation 07446-18 Heppell v Bella, 1 Accuracy (2018), 2 Privacy (2018), No breach – after investigation 08062-18 Gordon v Sunday Life, 3 Harassment (2018), No breach – after investigation 07925-18 Partlett v express.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2018), Breach – sanction: publication of adjudication 00154-19… [read post]
3 May 2019, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
  Annette Gordon-Reed makes sure legal history is part of HLS’s pre-orientation. [read post]
3 May 2019, 10:14 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Rogers College of Law, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZModerator:Joel Kurtzberg – Partner, Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP, New York, NYWhile the United States Supreme Court’s recent decision in National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. [read post]
1 May 2019, 8:10 am by Ilya Somin
Danforth, Cody Delistraty, Nikolas Gvosdev, Cherie Harder, Jason Kuznicki, Markos Moulitsas, Alan Taylor, James V. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 4:43 pm by Erica Vaccarello
In Iancu v Brunetti, the USPTO argues for the permanence of the “immoral or scandalous” provision. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 4:30 am by Carolina Pina
The court refers to the CJEU case C 251/95 SABEL BV v Puma AG, Rudolf Dassler Sport, 11 November 1997 to hold that the mere association which the public might make between two trademarks as a result of their analogous semantic content is not in itself a sufficient ground for concluding that there is a likelihood of confusion. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 3:32 am by Jody Coultas
The Eleventh Circuit agreed with that conclusion based on the plain language of the licensing agreement and affirmed the lower court’s decision (Kroma Makeup EU, LLC v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 2:50 am by Gustavo Giay
Gustavo GiayOn 26 September 2018, Division II of the Federal Court of Appeals of the City of Buenos Aires issued a decision in “Re adidas AG v. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 12:37 am by Sara Parrello
In case C-21/18, Textilis Ltd and Ozgur Keskin v Svenskt Tenn Aktiebolag, decided on March 14, 2019, the CJEU was asked whether the wording “other characteristics” of the new Article 7(1)(e)(iii) Regulation 2015/2424 may or may not be applied retroactively. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 6:22 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Consider Milstein v. [read post]