Search for: "General Dynamics Inc." Results 541 - 560 of 972
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2018, 6:31 am by Eliot Kim
This interpretation excluded the developed commercial activities exception, so the plaintiffs urged Judge Bates to instead follow the Third Circuit’s decision in OSS Nokalva, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2008, 10:25 am by Micah
And while a law firm's Web site is a biographical resource, few GCs use other components of Web sites, no matter how dynamic. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 12:49 pm
Securities case.In re Dynamic Random Access Memory (Dram) Antitrust Litigation, 516 F. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 2:51 am by Will Aitchison
Savi Technologies, Inc., 2011 WL 2414349 (W.D. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 5:00 am
Registration is free, but is only open to general counsel/in-house corporate counsel. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 7:57 am by Guest Blogger
THIRD, catch your audience’s attention through a dynamic opening. [read post]
14 May 2010, 4:19 am
Quattrocchi (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) TTAB finds SEARCH ENGINE OPTIMIZATION merely descriptive of marketing services (TTABlog) Trademark holder not entitled to domain name registered years before: National Arbitration Forum decision in Arizona State Trailer Sales, Inc. d/b/a Little Dealer Little Prices RV v. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 7:09 am
(Afro-IP)   Canada Canada – General Canadian i4i, Inc wins abroad, but is there any protection at home? [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 1:24 pm by WIMS
[#Energy/NatGas] GET THE REST OF TODAY'S NEWS (click here)Waste Information & Management Services, Inc. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 2:01 am by Marie Louise
(Laurence Kaye on Digital Media Law)   United States US General Can I object to the production of my client’s source code on the basis of relevance or confidentiality? [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 8:25 pm
Cir. 2001), and circumstantial evidence may be sufficient, Liquid Dynamics Corp. v. [read post]
24 May 2023, 3:55 pm by Keith Szeliga and Katie Calogero
Rather, the calculation of damages necessarily requires speculation regarding what price the parties would have negotiated if the data had been disclosed.[20] The Government has the burden to show “by some reasonable method” the amount it believes the final contract price was overstated.[21] There is a rebuttable presumption that the “natural and probable consequence” of defective cost or pricing data is a “dollar for dollar” increase in the contract price.[22]… [read post]