Search for: "General Motors Corporation Inc"
Results 541 - 560
of 658
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Class 46) India Chennai IP Appellate Board: Well-known trademarks - consumer recollection is key: Societe des Produits Nestle SA v Jai ram (International Law Office) Bombay High Court rules on the infringement of copyright in drawings: Indiana Gratings Private Limited & Anr v Anand Udyog Fabricators Private Limited & Ors (Spicy IP) Is ‘science’ essential for creating patent lawyers: some ‘general’ thoughts (Spicy IP)… [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Class 46) India Chennai IP Appellate Board: Well-known trademarks - consumer recollection is key: Societe des Produits Nestle SA v Jai ram (International Law Office) Bombay High Court rules on the infringement of copyright in drawings: Indiana Gratings Private Limited & Anr v Anand Udyog Fabricators Private Limited & Ors (Spicy IP) Is ‘science’ essential for creating patent lawyers: some ‘general’ thoughts (Spicy IP)… [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 1:48 am
District Court for the Southern District of New York on June 3, 200906/03/2009
Interim Order in the Matter of the Bankruptcy of the General Motors Corporation (PDF 328 KB)Order as Filed in the U.S. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 1:09 am
General Motors Corp.U.S. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 2:05 am
Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York06/02/2009
Brief in Support of Motion to Approve 363 Sale of General Motors Corporation to a New General Motors (PDF 544 KB)Motion as Filed in the U.S. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 1:51 am
Subscription needed for online access:
06/01/2009
Bankruptcy Filing in the Matter of General Motors Corporation (PDF 132 KB)Document as Filed in the U.S. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 12:17 pm
And that is exactly why General Motors filed bankruptcy in New York as Chrysler did ahead of it. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 12:00 am
Briefs and other papers for these cases may be found at TTABVUE via the links provided.June 3, 2009 - 11 AM: In re Hyundai Motor America, Serial No. 78889340 [Section 2(d) refusal to register the mark ECHELON for "automobiles" in view of the identical mark registered for "automotive tires"].June 11, 2009 - 2 PM: General Cable Technologies Corporation v. [read post]
29 May 2009, 7:53 am
And he’ll be running the show for General Motors if and when it files for Chapter 11 protection next Monday. [read post]
14 May 2009, 6:42 pm
General Motors says it will release its list of GM dealers who'll be chopped and reports are the numbers are only going to be bigger.Burdge Law Office[www.newcarlemonlaw.com]Helping consumers get rid of lemons since 1978.Subscribe in a reader [read post]
8 May 2009, 10:00 am
Chennai Live 104.8 FM asks the Madras High Court: Indian Performing Rights Society Ltd & Ors v Branch Manager, Muthoot Finance Private Limited, Chennai & Ors (Spicy IP) Bombay High Court: Use of inventions for government purposes: Garware Wall Ropes v A I Chopra Engineers & Contractors, Konkan Railway Corporation (IP Frontline) Beware Mumbaikers: The Slumlord’s Act could detain you for a year for simply buying a pirated DVD (Spicy IP) (At Last... the 1709… [read post]
6 May 2009, 2:43 pm
The final rule set forth: (1) that a requestfor exclusion must be accompanied by evidence that willmeet the statutory test for the exclusion outlined above;and (2) that the EXHR staff would evaluate the evidence andprovide a scientific recommendation to the Commission as towhether the party submitting the request had met thisstatutory test.The Specialty Vehicle Institute of America (SVIA),Polaris Industries, Inc., American Suzuki MotorCorporation, Arctic Cat Inc., Bombardier… [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 10:00 am
Here is why (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Innovative methods for corporate legal managers to reduce IP counsel costs (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) The malign and the benign of the transfer of know-how (IP finance) How to avoid potential conflict when inventors want their innovations back (Technology Transfer Tactics) 50% of venture capital investment is lost: How your clients can improve these odds by using the right patent analytics (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) New website, Intellogist, compares… [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 4:00 am
Ford Motor Co., No. 08-1082 (6th Cir. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 9:27 am
(IP finance) United States US General Obama Administration asked for ‘balance’ in intellectual property appointments (Public Knowledge) (Ars Technica) (Media Wonk) (EFF) (Law360) (Intellectual Property Watch) Identity of new USPTO Director may soon be revealed (IAM) The case against PACER: tearing down the courts’ paywall (Ars Technica) US General – Lawsuits and strategic steps Liner Grode Stein Yankelevitz Sunshine… [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 3:24 am
By skewing corporate governance away from profit maximization and towards meeting political goals, this influence could seriously alter current incentives and norms within the corporate governance of firms receiving federal money. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 1:41 am
Treasury and President's Auto Task Force Attributed to Chrysler, LLC Chairman and CEO Bob Nardelli (PDF 12 KB)Released by Chrysler, LLC03/30/2009
Viability Assessment for Chrysler, LLC (PDF 36 KB)Released by the White House03/30/2009
Viability Assessment for General Motors Corporation (PDF 36 KB)Released by the White House
© Copyright GalleryWatch.com, Inc. (1999 - 2009), provided under license.NO… [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 1:47 am
"
Czar Inc. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(Securing Innovation) PriorSmart.com search tool, tracking patent documents (Competitive Info) (Patently-O) Patent damages as an incentive to transact (IP finance) IPscore, new patent evaluation toy (IP finance) Patent portfolios can pull companies out of financial rut (Law360) Global - Copyright Expanding the public domain: part zero (Creative Commons) Australia Pioneering decision on non-use: Pioneer Computers Australia Pty Limited v Pioneer KK (Australian Trade… [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 8:24 pm
by Harvey Rosenfield, Founder of Consumer Watchdog, author of Proposition 103 Yesterday's oral argument before the California Supreme Court considered the question of whether the Consumers Legal Remedies Act (CLRA), one of the state's two principal consumer protection laws, applies to the sale of an insurance policy. [read post]
