Search for: "Goldstein v. State"
Results 541 - 560
of 1,725
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Nov 2014, 5:00 am
Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 6:06 am
” The debate over the use of social science and statistics at the oral argument in Schuette v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 8:32 pm
In my view, that federal decision was probably dictated by the Supreme Court’s 2005 decision upholding economic development takings in Kelo v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 2:42 am
Lopez-Venezuela, in which he criticized the Court’s failure to grant review of cases invalidating state statutes – such as the decisions striking down five states’ bans on same-sex marriage. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 9:22 am
The Supreme Court heard oral argument yesterday in CITGO Asphalt Refining Co. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 3:53 am
The first opinion that could emerge is a historic ruling on gun rights, resolving whether the Second Amendment restricts the gun-control powers of states, counties, and cities, and not just the federal government’s powers (McDonald v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 7:11 am
Florida and United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 4:04 am
At The Least Dangerous Blog, Joel Nolette weighs in on Knick v. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 11:22 pm
And these folks will not be from just the United States, they’ll be from all over the world. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 12:07 pm
Holly Gardens Citizens in Action — federal Fair Housing Act’s application to disparate-impact discrimination claims No. 12-1038 — United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 8:02 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 4:07 am
” Additional coverage of the solicitor general’s motion in United States v. [read post]
30 Sep 2021, 7:53 am
Avoiding recognition and enforcement abroad is not always possible; the August 2021 decision in Next Investments, LLC v. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 4:41 am
” At AntitrustConnect Blog, Steven Cernak looks at the “immediate aftermath” of the Court’s decision in North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 12:40 pm
United States, 09-11328, and Smith v. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 7:07 am
Joseph Chris Personnel Services, 07-929). ** Wbether the state of Kentucky acted unconstitutionally in its system of taxing multi-channel television providers — cable TV companies and satellite TV companies (DIRECTV v. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 4:31 am
The first is United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 1:00 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 3:44 am
Forest Service v. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 4:30 am
At Techdirt, Tim Cushing looks at this week’s argument in United States v. [read post]
