Search for: "Google Payment Corporation"
Results 541 - 560
of 695
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2012, 2:54 am
T 0568/10 A patent in the name of Nippon Steel Corporation was opposed by Tata Steel. [read post]
26 May 2015, 8:19 am
Risks posed by DMCA to legitimate security research: discovered serious vulnerabilities in a computer chip used to operate one of the largest wireless payments systems and widely used automotive security system. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 8:50 am
Have we segmented our payment card environments from the corporate environment and secured remote access through multi-factor authentication? [read post]
17 May 2012, 3:07 pm
These include collecting societies, terms of protection and payment models on the internet. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 5:16 am
Faced with corporate power and state power, Europe’s approach to the Internet[] is based on a clear guideline: people’s power. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 5:05 am
http://on.mash.to/Se5gNL (Neha Prakash) EU Claims Google Violates Privacy Laws – http://bit.ly/R0XQJA (Peter Vogel) EU Data Protection Regulation Proposal – Update – http://bit.ly/QYQN40 (Davinia Brennan) FBI Expands Cybercrime Division – http://bit.ly/Q61Uxd (Nicolas Hoover) FOCA – Network Intelligence Reconnaissance – http://bit.ly/Q1zxjE (Aamir Lakhani) GAO Study: Low Marks to Companies Regarding Transparency of Use of Consumer Location Data –… [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 5:00 am
Europe, in the case of Iran, has created a special purpose vehicle, known as INSTEX, to route around the U.S. payment system. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 5:45 am
There are two subgroups of this group:(1a) those who absolutely want business methods to be(come) patentable by declaring them as computer-implemented invention (CII) patents, and(1b) those who would probably invalidate the Alice patents anyway on non-novelty or obviousness grounds, but who don't want § 101 to be the vehicle for invalidation.The second group already wanted Bilski to result in a restrictive ruling that didn't happen then and won't happen now.I have some examples:Alice… [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 12:35 pm
Google, Effects Assoc. v. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 1:56 pm
That payment incentivizes market entry. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 2:30 am
. “The laws on hacking and payments are rather clear. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 5:40 am
, 443 US 97 (1979), Bose Corporation v. [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 8:09 am
He does say that the payment makes the speech even more "galling. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 5:08 pm
In addition, the statute only relates to Delaware corporations. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) CAFC decides Apotex and Impax infringed AstraZeneca’s Prilosec patents: (Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (GenericsWeb), CAFC upholds lower court’s decision finding USPTO was within its rights to subject a Cooper patent to… [read post]
14 Feb 2021, 1:11 am
Earlier this week I translated what, if affirmed (as I hope), will be a landmark antitrust ruling by the Munich I Regional Court against Google in the health information context. [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 9:55 am
Thanks to Katharine Stephens (Bird & Bird) for this guest post:On 27 September 2019, WIPO held a Conversation on IP and AI; a fascinating day of presentations and discussion on the impact of AI on IP systems, IP policies, IP rights management and international cooperation on IP matters. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 11:13 am
Google, Inc.: affirming the California Supreme Court’s rejection of the “stray remarks doctrine,” because the “existence of a hostile work environment depends on the totality of the circumstances and a discriminatory remark, even if made not directly in the context of an employment decision or uttered by a nondecisionmaker, may be relevant, circumstantial evidence of discrimination. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 12:56 pm
The power of corporations over individuals is so great that we need to understand what’s going on and institute forbidden grounds for making decisions (or at least disclosure to individuals of the record on which decisions were made).FTC recently settled with a couple of companies that were gathering pharmacy data not covered by HIPAA and using it to create profiles of individuals, then distributing that to insurance companies to make insurance decisions. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 7:12 am
We’re not just talking about “search neutrality” (Google as well as Microsoft) but also about “device neutrality” (mobile handsets), “app neutrality” (Apple’s iTunes store, Facebook’s developers and Google’s Android mobile OS) and so on for social networking, email, instant messaging, online advertising, etc. [read post]
