Search for: "Grant v. Parker"
Results 541 - 560
of 731
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Dec 2010, 12:50 pm
Accord: Yost, 2010 WL 1141586, at *4 (complaint “does not plead sufficient facts to state a claim on which relief may be granted” because it “fails to identify the specific language on which his breach of express warranty claim is based”); Williams v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 8:21 am
United States, 11-7328; Parker v. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 5:23 am
Marquess & Nell, Inc., 144 N.J. 34 (N.J. 1996); Parker v. [read post]
14 Sep 2008, 8:10 pm
The district court granted summary judgment to Defendants and dismissed the complaint. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 10:04 am
Seymour (11th Cir. 2013), where we granted qualified immunity to an officer, Parker, who "lacked the requisite information to put him on notice that an unlawful arrest was occurring or had occurred. [read post]
24 May 2010, 9:10 pm
The Court on Monday also granted certiorari in Henry Skinner v. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 7:50 pm
A similar argument was rejected long ago in Painless Parker v. [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 3:27 pm
S. 354, 360-361 (1959) (constitutional grant "empowered the federal courts . . . to continue the development of [maritime] law"). [read post]
22 May 2020, 8:19 am
International Value Advisers, LLC, May 20, 2020, Parker, B., and Rubenstein v. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 6:56 am
Stefano Barazza talks us through Medtronic v Mirowski in this PatLit post. [read post]
28 May 2009, 8:58 am
In Parker v. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 12:39 am
E.G. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2004, 9:47 am
Krebs v. [read post]
2 Oct 2016, 12:11 pm
See Parker v. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 6:04 am
A suit by another Hyde Parker, Paepcke v. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court will address in its upcoming term, is important because the Court previously granted states immunity from federal antitrust law in Parker v. [read post]
17 Jun 2012, 7:10 pm
One or more words that might reasonably be required by a competitor to describe similar goods/service cannot be such a badge.I'm going to be lazy here and simply paste in the relevant section of Clark Equipment Co v Registrar of Trade Marks [(1964) 111 CLR 51, in which Kitto J said:"In Registrar of Trade Marks v W. and G. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court will address in its upcoming term, is important because the Court previously granted states immunity from federal antitrust law in Parker v. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 8:10 am
Parker Fire Protection District. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 5:00 am
” — Parker Rider-Longmaid, one of Rodney Reed’s attorneys — April 19, 2023 The Court’s opinion in Reed v. [read post]
