Search for: "Grant v. Sullivan"
Results 541 - 560
of 1,009
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2012, 3:15 am
The plaintiff demonstrated his prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law on the first cause of action by tendering invoices for services rendered prior to December 5, 2006, setting forth his hourly rate, the billable hours expended, and the particular services rendered, and establishing that the defendant signed such invoices, failed to timely object to the invoices, and made partial payments thereon (see Landa v Dratch, 45 AD3d 646, 648; Landa v Sullivan, 255… [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 4:05 am
But the Court did grant cert. on the question, even in the absence of a circuit split, and so it's safe to assume at least some Justices thought there might be something to it. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 4:41 pm
Granted Issue: Whether an Article 134 clause 1 or 2 specification that fails to expressly allege either potential terminal element states an offense under the Supreme Court’s holdings in United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2012, 7:00 am
As I wrote last month in my post about the GPC v. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 6:28 am
The IP address was registered to Euple Sullivan. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 1:51 pm
Sullivan and Gertz v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 4:51 am
Citing an earlier Supreme Court ATS case, Sosa v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 4:51 am
Citing an earlier Supreme Court ATS case, Sosa v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 12:05 pm
., v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 7:34 am
Eileen Sullivan of the Associated Press tells us that grant funds administered to help law enforcement drug crime-fighting efforts are being used by the NYPD in its surveillance efforts on American Muslim neighborhoods. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 5:12 pm
., Appellant v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 10:47 pm
CAAF heard oral argument in United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 6:59 pm
" [Stewart v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 8:39 am
[All of the facts in this post come from the 11th Circuit opinion in United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 8:39 am
He charges $300 per hour and, during his November 2008 testimony in U.S. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 5:45 am
As the facts of the DuPont v. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 12:30 pm
DOYLE ALLEN CASTLE v. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 10:24 am
., v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 2:25 pm
Circuit precedent, Judge Jackson noted that the Court’s observations in Serono Labs., Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 4:06 pm
In AMP v Persons Unknown [2011] EWHC 3454 (TCC) (20 December 2011), in the Technology and Construction court, an applicant successfully invoked her right to privacy under Article 8, and the Protection from Harassment Act 1997, and was granted an interim injunction to prevent transmission, storage and indexing of any part or parts of certain photographic images taken from the phone, and an anonymity order under CPR r.39.2(4), as explained by Rosalind English here. [read post]
