Search for: "Grant v. Union Bank" Results 541 - 560 of 764
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2014, 8:59 am by Barry Sookman
For example, the US Congress,[2] the European Union[3] and its member states including the UK[4] and Ireland,[5] Australia[6] and others have been re-examining their copyright laws in light of the challenges posed by digital technologies. [read post]
It does seem incongruous to demand constituent disclosure of unions, but is that because it is impractical or because unions are presumptively benign? [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 12:08 pm
     Domestic supporters and opponents        Patent reform has drawn the attention of a wide range of industries and interest groups, from technology firms and banks to unions and even foreign countries. [read post]
8 May 2012, 11:06 am
If the jurisdiction of the Forum to grant relief is confined to the four clauses mentioned under Section 14, it passes our comprehension as to how an interim injunction could ever be granted disregarding even the balance of convenience. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 3:59 am
Justice NandrajogDelhi High CourtThe Division Bench of the Delhi High Court in a recent decision in Virender Singh v State Bank of India has recapitulated the importance and object of the Slum Clearance Act in matters where the landlord seeks to evict tenants under the relevant rent control legislation. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 10:05 pm
The purpose of this post is to comment on another important judgment, Indian Council for Enviro-Legal Action v Union of India, in which the Court has considered certain principles of the law of unjust enrichment in some detail. [read post]
Lord Neuberger was also keen to stress that commercial common sense (which had been applied in Rainy Sky SA v Kookmin Bank [2011] UKSC 50 where there was ambiguity in the interpretation of a clause) should not be “invoked to undervalue the importance of the language of the provision which is to be construed”. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm by Noah Brown
Supreme Court granted certiorari in Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 7:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: WIPO review of UDRP disputes - record number of complaints handled by WIPO in 2008 (WIPO) (Out-Law) (Michael Geist) (Managing Intellectual Property) (Class 46) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Law360) Goverment outlines new creative industries’ Digital Rights Agency proposed in Digital Britain report (Out-Law) (IP finance) (Intellectual… [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
- Amsterdam Court of Appeal rules in favour of Hachette Filipacchi Press, publisher of Elle magazine, in trade name/trade mark infringement litigation brought by clothing company WE Netherlands (Class 46)   Poland District Administrative Court in Warsaw: ALDO S and ALDI not similar (Class 46)   South Africa More on the Springbok emblem (Afro-IP)   Sweden Appeal Court rules on reproduction of album cover artwork in case against Åhléns (International… [read post]
7 Jul 2019, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
They were granted access to six live facial recognition (LFR) system trials by the MPS which took place in Soho, Romford and at the Westfield shopping centre in Stratford, east London. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 12:47 pm by Elina Saxena, Quinta Jurecic
Two Palestinians were killed and three Israelis wounded during the continuing violence in the West Bank and Gaza, Reuters reports. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 11:17 am by Anna Christensen
NFL (08-661) Argued: Jan. 13, 2010 Issue: Whether NFLP, the NFL, and the teams functioned as a “single entity” when granting the company an exclusive headwear license and therefore could not violate Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. 1, which requires proof of collective action involving “separate entities. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 6:41 am by Kurt Lash, guest-blogging
Cooter and Siegel, for example, believe that a Resolution VI-based reading of Article I, Section 8 support revisiting the analysis in United States v. [read post]