Search for: "Griffin v. Griffin" Results 541 - 560 of 1,487
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2010, 3:19 am by Adam Kolber
This piece, recently posted to SSRN, suggests that the obligations to disclose under the Tarasoff case caused an increase in homicide (presumably by disincentivizing treatment of the most at-risk patients): "Doing Their Duty: An Empirical Analysis of the Unintended Effect of Tarasoff v Regents on Homicidal Activity"  GRIFFIN SIMS EDWARDS, Emory University, Department of EconomicsThe effect of state duty to warn laws inspired by Tarasoff v Regents has been… [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 5:06 am by Amy Howe
Yesterday’s argument in Yates v. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 3:52 am by Amy Howe
Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 3:24 am by Amy Howe
At Hamilton and Griffin on Rights, Ann McGinley analyzes last week’s decision in Young v. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 4:15 am by Larisa Vaysman
Judge Griffin dissented, pointing out (among other things) that the majority opinion conflicted with the recent Fourth Circuit in Lund v. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:03 pm by Ryan Goodman
Welcome to this all-source repository of information for analysts, researchers, investigators, journalists, educators, and the public at large. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 3:39 am by Amy Howe
 A preview comes from Bill Mears of Fox News, with commentary from Leslie Griffin at Hamilton and Griffin on Rights, Greg Lipper at Bill of Health Blog and Doug Laycock in The Washington Post. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 4:43 am by Amy Howe
” In CTS Corp. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 3:00 pm by Giles Peaker
 Commission for Equality & Human Rights v Griffin & Ors [2010] EWHC 3343 (Admin). [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 5:33 am by Amy Howe
  At Hamilton and Griffin on Rights, Leslie Griffin contends that Justice Scalia’s dissent from the denial of review in the case “was not really about” the Court’s recent decision in Town of Greece v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 3:45 pm by Steven Calabresi
[Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment and the Incompatibility Clause both apply to "officers under the United States" and must thus mean the same thing] The oral argument today in Trump v. [read post]